| CFJ: | 2736 |
| Interest Index: | 0 |
| Statement: | ais523 has initiated a CFJ on the statement 'This is a CFJ.' within the past 24 hours. |
| Caller: | Murphy |
| Judge: | Yally |
| Judgement: | FALSE |
| Appeal: | 2736a |
| Decision: | AFFIRM |
| Currently Eligible: | coppro |
History:
| Called by Murphy | 17 Nov 2009 16:11:48 GMT |
| Assigned to Yally | 17 Nov 2009 16:14:23 GMT |
| Judged FALSE by Yally | 24 Nov 2009 21:54:37 GMT |
| Appealed by Murphy | 24 Nov 2009 22:47:17 GMT |
| Appealed by ais523 | 24 Nov 2009 23:04:06 GMT |
| Appealed by coppro | 24 Nov 2009 23:06:21 GMT |
| Appeal 2736a | 24 Nov 2009 23:06:21 GMT |
| AFFIRMED on Appeal | 1 Dec 2009 23:06:21 GMT |
Caller's Evidence: | (17 Nov 2009 16:11:48 GMT) |
ais523 wrote: > I zoop a CFJ on the statement "This is a CFJ." > > Arguments: zooping isn't really defined in this context, but most > Agorans have a basic idea of what it's meant to mean. Given that I could > just create a CFJ by announcement, what happens here?
Judge Yally's Arguments: | (24 Nov 2009 21:54:37 GMT) |
I really can't say I have a clear idea of what "zooping" means. I don't know if it's something from a contract, some foreign word, some strange nomic word I'm not familiar with, or just a way to add a silly word that means nothing. For that matter, I opine that 2736 is FALSE.
