Format for e-mail
| CFJ: | 2717 |
| Interest Index: | 0 |
| Statement: | On or around Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:37 the office of Grand Poobah successfully audited ais523. |
| Caller: | BobTHJ |
| Barred: | ais523 |
| |
| Judge: | Tiger |
| Judgement: | FALSE |
| |
| Currently Eligible: | (none) |
History:
| Called by BobTHJ | 7 Oct 2009 20:59:51 GMT |
| Assigned to Tiger | 14 Oct 2009 22:42:37 GMT |
| Judged FALSE by Tiger | 15 Oct 2009 19:30:51 GMT |
Gratuitous Arguments by ais523: | | (7 Oct 2009 20:51:52 GMT) |
If you're planning to run a timing scam, it helps to actually
get the timing right. If you're going to use an automated system to
write your messages, it's your own fault if it ruins any scams you might
plan to run. (Whatever happened to two actions that need to be
uninterrupted for a scam being sent in the /same message/, like everyone
else's timing scams are?)
Caller's Arguments: | | (7 Oct 2009 20:59:51 GMT) |
The rules require dealors to audit the player or players
currently holding the most cards from the respective deck. At the time
I initiated the audit via my web-interface the player currently
holding the most Government cards was ais523. However, in the ~30
seconds it took my script to process and spit out the automated e-mail
to the list ais523 sent the above referenced message which appears to
have reached the list first.
Caller's Evidence: | | (7 Oct 2009 20:59:51 GMT) |
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 14:35, ais523 <callforjudgement@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 14:32 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I'm doing this because:
>>
>> a) Murphy would be the target if I didn't, and I don't think e deserves it.
>> b) There are only a handful of players with enough cards to come close
>> to hitting the limit
>> c) ais523 recently ran a scam that created rests a lot of rests and
>> never cleaned those rests up when e was done
>>
>> I transfer Arm-Twist x8 and Roll Call x13 to ais523.
>>
>> I IBA-withdraw Roll Call x13 (for 260zm I believe)
>>
>> I transfer Roll Call x13 to ais523.
>>
>> Since the penalty for this will be rather severe (14 rests) I submit
>> the following proposal and make it distributable:
>
> I transfer Arm-Twist x8 and Roll Call x26 to the L&FD.
>
Hmm....according to the list your message beat mine.
Gratuitous Arguments by BobTHJ: | | (7 Oct 2009 20:59:51 GMT) |
Admittedly, I botched this. I decided to split it into two mails so
that my system could automatically process the audit and save me the
hassle of entering it manually. I sent the first message and then
clicked to auto-generate the second message only a few seconds later.
However, apparently the server where I have my automation running was
just finishing a re-start cycle and (due to the way ASP.NET works) it
had to re-compile all my code and restart the application before the
mail processed.
That being the case, I'm not convinced that it invalidated the audit.
Gratuitous Arguments by ais523: | | (7 Oct 2009 21:07:41 GMT) |
In addition, this did indeed
invalidate the audit as BobTHJ could have stopped his mail being sent
after my mail had already been received (say by interrupting the
compile); in fact, according to the headers my email was received at the
lists before BobTHJ's even claims to have been sent.
Judge Tiger's Arguments: | | (15 Oct 2009 19:30:51 GMT) |
FALSE, deferring to ais523's arguments. The caller should work on eir timing.
