View Case - CFJ 2707

Format for e-mail

CFJ:2707
Interest Index: 0
Statement:It is LEGAL to methodically spam the email accounts of former players.
Caller:c.
 
Judge:Murphy
Judgement:TRUE
 
Currently Eligible:(none)

History:

Called by c.24 Sep 2009 22:21:12 GMT
Assigned to Murphy26 Sep 2009 19:03:14 GMT
Judged TRUE by Murphy26 Sep 2009 19:12:43 GMT



Caller's Arguments:

(24 Sep 2009 22:21:12 GMT)

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> 2009/9/24 Kerim Aydin <kerim@u.washington.edu>:
>> You might infer that, if being a contract member is "playing", that R101
>> conflicts with R1742, and when you deregister (a single process, well-
>> defined!) you'd cease to be in a contract because R101 has precedence
>> over R1742, but that IN NO WAY IMPLIES that the process of doing so is
>> anything other than the rules-defined deregistration announcement.
>
> Arguments: It's just convenient shorthand for "regular deregistration
> that R101 makes funky".



Judge Murphy's Arguments:

(26 Sep 2009 19:12:43 GMT)

Such an action does not constitute the former players playing,
so R101(vii) is silent on the matter.