Format for e-mail
| Appeal in the matter of: |
CFJ 2689 |
| |
| Panelist: | Pavitra |
| Decision: | REMAND |
| |
| Panelist: | coppro |
| Decision: | REMAND |
| |
| Panelist: | BobTHJ |
| Decision: | REMAND |
| |
| Currently Eligible: | ais523, G., Murphy, Yally |
History:
| Appeal initiated | 20 Sep 2009 17:20:24 GMT |
| Assigned to Pavitra (panelist) | 23 Sep 2009 22:21:45 GMT |
| Assigned to coppro (panelist) | 23 Sep 2009 22:21:45 GMT |
| Assigned to BobTHJ (panelist) | 23 Sep 2009 22:21:45 GMT |
| coppro moves to REMAND | 23 Sep 2009 22:26:26 GMT |
| BobTHJ moves to REMAND | 23 Sep 2009 22:26:59 GMT |
| Pavitra moves to REMAND | 24 Sep 2009 03:19:30 GMT |
| Final decision (REMAND) | 24 Sep 2009 03:19:30 GMT |
Appellant coppro's Arguments: | | (20 Sep 2009 17:09:05 GMT) |
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this case, as the judgment does not
seem to concur with the arguments. I recommend REMAND.
Appellant Walker's Arguments: | | (20 Sep 2009 17:16:13 GMT) |
ah, dammit. coppro is right, I meant FALSE. I support.
