Format for e-mail
| Appeal in the matter of: |
CFJ 2679 |
| |
| Panelist: | Murphy |
| Decision: | REMAND |
| |
| Panelist: | comex |
| Decision: | REMAND |
| |
| Panelist: | Pavitra |
| Decision: | REMAND |
| |
| Panelist: | BobTHJ |
| Decision: | REMAND |
| |
| Panelist: | Walker |
| Decision: | REMAND |
| |
| Currently Eligible: | G., Wooble, Yally |
History:
| Appeal initiated | 16 Sep 2009 16:16:29 GMT |
| Assigned to Murphy (panelist) | 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT |
| Assigned to comex (panelist) | 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT |
| Assigned to Pavitra (panelist) | 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT |
| Assigned to BobTHJ (panelist) | 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT |
| Assigned to Walker (panelist) | 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT |
| Murphy moves to REMAND | 26 Sep 2009 18:12:44 GMT |
| comex moves to REMAND | 26 Sep 2009 19:55:25 GMT |
| Walker moves to REMAND | 27 Sep 2009 09:05:17 GMT |
| BobTHJ moves to REMAND | 28 Sep 2009 15:01:26 GMT |
| Pavitra moves to REMAND | 30 Sep 2009 22:20:00 GMT |
| Final decision (REMAND) | 30 Sep 2009 22:20:00 GMT |
Appellant Murphy's Arguments: | | (16 Sep 2009 06:49:57 GMT) |
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal. The arguments indicate that
the transfer failed, but the statement is "ais523 owns a Dunce Cap
card" which should have been judged TRUE. I recommend REASSIGN,
as coppro presumably just mis-remembered the statement as "ais523
transferred a Dunce Cap card" or something similar.
Appellant coppro's Arguments: | | (16 Sep 2009 16:16:29 GMT) |
I support and do so, as I misread the statement. I recommend REMAND.
Panelist Pavitra's Arguments: | | (30 Sep 2009 22:20:00 GMT) |
[no opinion given]
