View Case - CFJ 1883

Format for e-mail

CFJ:1883
Statement:Where the above referenced decision on amending the Vote Market agreement able to be validly resolved as of the calling of this CFJ would Pavitra's vote of OBJECT be valid?
Caller:BobTHJ
 
Judge:Murphy
Judgement:UNDECIDABLE
 
Currently Eligible:(none)

History:

Called by BobTHJ26 Jan 2008 17:29:12 GMT
Assigned to Murphy26 Jan 2008 19:28:14 GMT
Judged UNDECIDABLE by Murphy26 Jan 2008 19:31:47 GMT



Judge Murphy's Arguments:

(26 Jan 2008 19:31:47 GMT)

The "statements" in these CFJs are actually questions, which cannot
be accurately described as either false or true.  Accordingly, I
judge UNDECIDABLE.