CFJ 2138: Called by Murphy (15 Aug); Judged FALSE by Goethe (15 Aug) If a partner acts on behalf of a partnership to transfer an asset, it is still the partner's asset that is transferred (provided that e has such an asset, and that the transfer is otherwise POSSIBLE). CFJ 2137: Called by Murphy (15 Aug); Judged FALSE by Goethe (15 Aug) If a partner acts on behalf of a partnership to cast a vote, that vote is still cast by that partner, and is thus subject to that partner's voting limit. CFJ 2136: Called by comex (14 Aug); CASE OPEN CFJ 2050 was filed by ehird CFJ 2135: Called by Quazie (13 Aug); Judged FALSE by Murphy (22 Aug) Quazie's activity switch was flipped to inactive by the above message. CFJ 2134: Called by cdm014 (13 Aug); CASE OPEN Gender Neutral pronouns(e.g eir, e, and e's) are words granted meaning and usage under the set of rules excluding 754(4). CFJ 2133: Called by tusho (09 Aug); Judged FALSE by Wooble (15 Aug) ". The previous sentence is false." results in being performed. CFJ 2132: Called by tusho (09 Aug); Judged TRUE by Sgeo (10 Aug); APPEAL PENDING I am sitting. CFJ 2131: Called by tusho (09 Aug); Judged TRUE by comex (10 Aug) I am a player. CFJ 2130: Called by tusho (09 Aug); Judged TRUE by comex (10 Aug) tusho is a player. CFJ 2129: Called by tusho (08 Aug); Judged TRUE by Wooble (09 Aug) A player can be nominated to be Rulekeepor. CFJ 2128: Called by Sgeo (08 Aug); Judged UNDETERMINED by Goethe (09 Aug) I violated Rule 2149 by claiming that I lie when I did not, in fact lie. CFJ 2127: Called by Wooble (05 Aug); Judged FALSE by Murphy (09 Aug) The devolution of the AFO's obligations onto comex means that the AFO is in breach of the AAA agreement if comex calls CFJs for the clear purpose of allowing the CFJ to harvest their ID numbers. CFJ 2126: Called by comex (05 Aug); Judged IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ (10 Aug) I need more Water Rights Vouchers! CFJ 2125: Called by comex (05 Aug); Judged IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ (10 Aug) I need more Water Rights Vouchers! CFJ 2124: Called by comex (05 Aug); Judged IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ (10 Aug) I need more Water Rights Vouchers! CFJ 2123: Called by comex (05 Aug); Judged IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ (10 Aug) I need more Water Rights Vouchers! CFJ 2122: Called by comex (05 Aug); Judged IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ (10 Aug) I need more Water Rights Vouchers! CFJ 2121: Called by Goethe (04 Aug); Judged FALSE by woggle (14 Aug) The Speaker CAN assign prerogatives for September 2008. CFJ 2120: Called by Goethe (04 Aug); Judged TRUE by woggle (14 Aug) The Speaker CAN assign prerogatives for August 2008. CFJ 2119: Called by tusho (04 Aug); AWAITING ASSIGNMENT ihope has not ascended the game and is not performing the action of ascending the game at this moment. CFJ 2118: Called by Wooble (04 Aug); CASE OPEN A judicial finding has determined that X, for the purposes of R2125 and R2161, if and only if a CFJ directly inquiring into the veracity of either X or not X has a judgment of TRUE or FALSE respectively. CFJ 2117: Called by Ivan Hope (29 Jul); Judged TRUE by Sgeo (04 Aug) Posting the string [ed: moved to evidence due to length] to a Public Forum would be Monstrous Consent. CFJ 2116: Called by Wooble (28 Jul); Judged UNDETERMINED by comex (10 Aug) The contract quoted above currently has Ivan Hope CXXVII as a party. CFJ 2115: Called by Ivan Hope (28 Jul); Judged UNDECIDABLE by woggle (18 Aug) Immediately after a judge is assigned to this case, it will be legal for that judge to judge FALSE on its question on veracity. CFJ 2114: Called by Quazie (25 Jul); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (04 Aug) If an entity is not elgible to own a particular type of asset, then they own zero of that asset CFJ 2113: Called by Wooble (25 Jul); Judged INNOCENT by ais523 (04 Aug) Sgeo violated Rule 1742 by leaving the contract "The Winning Team" when the contract forbid leaving the contract. CFJ 2112: Called by comex (23 Jul); Judged FALSE by woggle (01 Aug) Publishing the message "I object", in response to an attempt to perform a dependent action, causes an action to be taken by announcement. CFJ 2111: Called by tusho (23 Jul); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Murphy (02 Aug) tusho violated rule 2149 by stating that the initiation of this CFJ will fail. CFJ 2110: Called by Murphy (23 Jul); Judged FALSE by ais523 (15 Aug) At least two of the valid votes on Proposal 5648 were cast by the same player. CFJ 2109: Called by OscarMeyr (22 Jul); Judged TRUE by Murphy (25 Jul) A non-player can violate a rule of Agora. CFJ 2108: Called by BobTHJ (22 Jul); CASE OPEN Ivan Hope has failed to increase eir VP holdings above 50 within the allotted 60 day timeframe. CFJ 2107: Called by Goethe (22 Jul); Judged GUILTY by Wooble (28 Jul); REMANDED on Appeal (10 Aug); CASE OPEN Ivan Hope violated R2149 by making the untruthful statement "UNDECIDABLE is never appropriate." CFJ 2106: Called by Ivan Hope (22 Jul); Judged ALREADY TRIED by Wooble (09 Aug) Goethe violated rule 2158 by judging UNDECIDABLE on CFJ 2087. CFJ 2105: Called by Ivan Hope (22 Jul); Judged GUILTY by Wooble (09 Aug) Goethe violated rule 2158 by judging UNDECIDABLE on CFJ 2086. CFJ 2104: Called by Goethe (21 Jul); Judged FALSE by BobTHJ (25 Jul) ihope changed eir Registrar-recorded nickname to avpx on or about Jul 19th. CFJ 2103: Called by Sgeo (21 Jul); Judged SLIPPERY by OscarMeyr (07 Aug); REMANDED on Appeal (15 Aug); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (18 Aug) I violated Rule 2149 by claiming that I lie when I did not, in fact lie. CFJ 2102: Called by comex (21 Jul); Judged SLIPPERY by ais523 (01 Aug) OscarMeyr violated Rule 2149 by claiming that tusho could not have violated any rules because e was not a player. CFJ 2101: Called by Sgeo (20 Jul); Judged TRUE by comex (09 Aug); APPEAL PENDING Equity case judgements violate R101(iv). CFJ 2100: Called by Wooble (20 Jul); Judged by Murphy (09 Aug) upon Ivan Hope transferring to em all eir VPs, Sgeo did not, as soon as possible, transfer all eir VPs to Ivan Hope. CFJ 2099: Called by Pavitra (19 Jul); Judged FALSE by Wooble (28 Jul) I transfer all my crops to the PNP. CFJ 2098: Called by ais523 (18 Jul); Judged FALSE by Wooble (19 Jul) No matter what their contents, all public messages contain at least one game-relevant action CFJ 2097: Called by Quazie (18 Jul); Judged FALSE by woggle (26 Jul) The Executor of a message that contains a CFJ is also the Initiator of that CFJ, even if the Executor says E submits the CFJ on behalf of someone/something else CFJ 2096: Called by root (17 Jul); Judged TRUE by Murphy (25 Jul) There is an inquiry case with the ID number 2073. CFJ 2095: Called by Goethe (17 Jul); Judged UNDETERMINED by ais523 (29 Jul) The statement labeled by the CotC as the CFJ statement for CFJ 2080 was a CFJ statement called by Quazie. CFJ 2094: Called by Goethe (17 Jul); Judged UNDETERMINED by ais523 (29 Jul) The statement labeled by the CotC as the CFJ statement for CFJ 2079 was a CFJ statement called by root. CFJ 2093: Called by Murphy (19 Jul); Judged FALSE by Goethe (21 Jul) Human Point Two bears the patent title Minister Without Portfolio CFJ 2092: Called by tusho (16 Jul); Judged INNOCENT by comex (10 Aug) tusho violated rule 101 by abridging, reducing, limiting, or removing Blind, Deaf and Mute's rights. CFJ 2091: Called by tusho (16 Jul); Judged INNOCENT by comex (10 Aug) Quazie violated rule 101 by abridging, reducing, limiting, or removing Blind, Deaf and Mute's rights. CFJ 2090: Called by Quazie (16 Jul); Judged TRUE by ais523 (21 Jul); REMANDED on Appeal (08 Aug); Judged TRUE by ais523 (11 Aug) CFJ 2019 is a valid CFJ. CFJ 2089: Called by woggle (16 Jul); Judged TRUE by Quazie (19 Jul) The PerlNomic Partnership transferred 150 chits to woggle as a result of the quoted message. CFJ 2088: Called by Wooble (16 Jul); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (20 Jul) tusho violated Rule 2029 by changing eir posture to sitting. CFJ 2087: Called by tusho (15 Jul); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Goethe (22 Jul); APPEAL PENDING I CFJ on the following statement. CFJ 2086: Called by tusho (15 Jul); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Goethe (22 Jul); APPEAL PENDING I CFJ on the previous statement. CFJ 2085: Called by comex (15 Jul); Judged UNIMPUGNED by OscarMeyr (01 Aug) comex breached rule 2149 by thinking up statements that will be public although they are not true before e has sent them CFJ 2084: Called by comex (15 Jul); Judged SLIPPERY by OscarMeyr (27 Jul) comex breached rule 2149 by sending a message with message-id <6bf32280807151511sfca8f7dveb137ee7d95c576@mail.gmail.com> in which e did not tell the truth (because e did not say anything) CFJ 2083: Called by comex (15 Jul); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (27 Jul) root breached rule 2149 by claiming that the precedent from CFJ 1738 is that speech acts carry truth values CFJ 2082: Called by comex (15 Jul); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (27 Jul); APPEAL PENDING ehird breached rule 2149 by claiming to kill Goethe in eir message with message-id <784a579e0807151341l7123d535wdfcc5376130d2cb2@mail.gmail.com> CFJ 2081: Called by comex (15 Jul); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (27 Jul) Goethe breached rule 2149 by claiming to dance in eir message with message-id CFJ 2080: Called by Quazie (15 Jul); Judged TRUE by Murphy (17 Jul) I CFJ on this statement. CFJ 2079: Called by root (15 Jul); Judged TRUE by woggle (19 Jul) I CFJ on this statement. CFJ 2078: Called by Wooble (14 Jul); CASE OPEN Two contracts CAN have the same name. CFJ 2077: Called by Ivan Hope (14 Jul); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (17 Jul); REMANDED on Appeal (21 Jul); CASE OPEN Ivan Hope is a player CFJ 2076: Called by tusho (14 Jul); Judged FALSE by Quazie (20 Jul) tusho has 24 VP. CFJ 2075: Called by tusho (14 Jul); Judged FALSE by Quazie (20 Jul) ehird is a player. CFJ 2074: Called by tusho (14 Jul); Judged FALSE by Quazie (20 Jul) tusho is a player. CFJ 2073: Called by Ivan Hope (14 Jul); Judged TRUE by Wooble (17 Jul) Either the sky is always red or, if I do not hereby initiate an inquiry case on this sentence, then the sky is always green. CFJ 2072: Called by BobTHJ (13 Jul); Judged UNAWARE by OscarMeyr (18 Jul) the CotC (Murphy) violated R2019 by not assigning the Default Justice (myself) to be member of this appeals panel. CFJ 2071: Called by comex (11 Jul); Judged TRUE by Goethe (17 Jul) If there had been no disclaimer in the message sent by comex with Message-ID <6bf32280807111120s54788104x1e5e3a3001cb1be5@mail.gmail.com>, and Rule 2208 did not exist, comex would have taken at least one action besides submitting a CFJ by sending it. CFJ 2070: Called by comex (11 Jul); Judged TRUE by Goethe (17 Jul) If there had been no disclaimer in the message sent by comex with Message-ID <6bf32280807111120s54788104x1e5e3a3001cb1be5@mail.gmail.com>, comex would have taken at least one action besides submitting a CFJ by sending it. CFJ 2069: Called by Goethe (11 Jul); Judged FALSE by ais523 (18 Jul); REMANDED on Appeal (13 Aug); Judged FALSE by ais523 (15 Aug) There are no game-relevant actions or intents of action in the message sent by comex with Message-ID: <6bf32280807111120s54788104x1e5e3a3001cb1be5@mail.gmail.com> CFJ 2068: Called by Sgeo (11 Jul); Judged TRUE by Murphy (25 Jul) Sgeo is obligated to give Ivan Hope CXXVII an amount of VP CFJ 2067: Called by Ivan Hope (11 Jul); Judged by Wooble (20 Jul) Sgeo could stash all the currency I didn't give him, then claim he only has to give back what he has after stashing. This is clearly a great injustice. CFJ 2066: Called by Goethe (08 Jul); Judged FALSE by woggle (17 Jul) Goethe won by extortion on or about July 7, 2008. CFJ 2065: Called by tusho (07 Jul); Judged FALSE by woggle (17 Jul); AFFIRMED on Appeal (17 Jul) Sgeo has won today or yesterday (relative to the initiation of this CFJ). CFJ 2064: Called by ais523 (07 Jul); Judged FALSE by Quazie (17 Jul) The message quoted in the evidence section of this CFJ changed the text of a public contract CFJ 2062: Called by Ivan Hope (05 Jul); Judged TRUE by ais523 (07 Jul) The contract Ivan Hope just agreed to is a pledge because it states "Guvf vf n cyrqtr.", which is "This is a pledge." in rot13. CFJ 2061: Called by root (03 Jul); Judged TRUE by ais523 (21 Jul) The Reformed Bank of Agora is a partnership. CFJ 2060: Called by Sgeo (02 Jul); Judged FALSE by Goethe (04 Jul) The CotC MAY NOT refuse cases based on cases being excess as defined by Rule 2175 CFJ 2059: Called by Goethe (01 Jul); Judged FALSE by ais523 (04 Jul) BobTHJ holds the Patent Title Left in a Huff. CFJ 2058: Called by ais523 (01 Jul); Judged TRUE by Quazie (05 Jul); REMANDED on Appeal (03 Aug); Judged TRUE by cdm014 (18 Aug) If an officer attempts to post a self-ratifying report to a public forum, but it does not arrive until over a week after it left the officer's technical domain of control, the report nonetheless self-ratifies even though none of the other players are aware of what its contents are. CFJ 2057: Called by Murphy (01 Jul); Judged TRUE by Goethe (02 Jul) ehrid is a player. CFJ 2056: Called by Taral (01 Jul); Judged TRUE by Wooble (09 Jul) A message containing one action sent to multiple fora is still only one action. CFJ 2055: Called by Wooble (30 Jun); Judged TRUE by woggle (05 Jul) ais523 was a person on Agora's birthday. CFJ 2054: Called by ais523 (30 Jun); Judged FALSE by Murphy (02 Jul) ais523 has a Magenta Ribbon CFJ 2053: Called by tusho (30 Jun); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (13 Jul); REMANDED on Appeal (21 Jul); Judged ALREADY TRIED by pikhq (11 Aug) ehird violated rule 2149 by lying. CFJ 2052: Called by BobTHJ (27 Jun); Judged by woggle (26 Jul) OscarMeyr has explicitly refused to join the Agoran Slavery pledge, and the other players have implicitly refused to do so by their inaction. CFJ 2051: Called by BobTHJ (27 Jun); Judged FALSE by woggle (05 Jul) ais523 can fill the Buy Ticket specified in the evidence more than once. CFJ 2050: Called by tusho (27 Jun); Judged FALSE by Wooble (06 Jul) This CFJ was filed by ehird CFJ 2049: Called by tusho (27 Jun); Judged TRUE by Murphy (27 Jun) This CFJ exists. CFJ 2048: Called by comex (26 Jun); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Taral (06 Jul); OVERTURNED on Appeal (25 Jul); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (01 Aug); AFFIRMED on Appeal (15 Aug) ehird violated Rule 2149 by saying that e joins. CFJ 2047: Called by tusho (25 Jun); Judged FALSE by BobTHJ (27 Jun) notehird is a registered player. CFJ 2046: Called by tusho (25 Jun); Judged TRUE by Goethe (27 Jun) ehrid devolves its obligations onto at least two people. CFJ 2045: Called by Quazie (25 Jun); Judged TRUE by Murphy (12 Jul) Comex objected to the termination of the pledge which allows anything to act on behalf of ehird. CFJ 2044: Called by ais523 (25 Jun); Judged UNIMPUGNED by OscarMeyr (04 Jul) comex violated rule 2185 by failing to assign a judgement to an open and applicable judicial question of CFJ 2006 as soon as possible. CFJ 2043: Called by ais523 (25 Jun); Judged UNIMPUGNED by OscarMeyr (04 Jul) comex violated rule 2185 by failing to assign a judgement to an open and applicable judicial question of CFJ 1996 as soon as possible. CFJ 2042: Called by Goethe (24 Jun); Judged TRUE by Quazie (02 Jul) If a partnership dissolves after having incurred obligations from another contract, the former members may be required by an equity settlement involving the second contract to be a parties to the settlement. CFJ 2041: Called by Goethe (24 Jun); Judged TRUE by Quazie (02 Jul) If a partnership incurs contract obligations from another contract while a particular member is a member, and that member departs the partnership, the member in question may be required by an equity settlement involving the second contract to be a party to the settlement, even if the partnership agreement does not explicitly allow this. CFJ 2040: Called by Goethe (24 Jun); Judged TRUE by Quazie (02 Jul) If a partnership is party to another contract, individual members of the contract may be required, by an equity settlement involving the second contract, to be parties to the settlement, even if the partnership agreement does not explicitly allow this. CFJ 2039: Called by Quazie (24 Jun); Judged by Sgeo (28 Jul) The Judgement of CFJ 2029 indicates that BobTHJ is in violation of point 12 of the AAA contract by not creating a mill in the possession of Quazie after revoking 3 points from em. CFJ 2038: Called by BobTHJ (24 Jun); Judged by Murphy (12 Jul) Due to eir deregistration ehird has not acted in the manner envisioned by section 11 of the contract. CFJ 2037: Called by BobTHJ (24 Jun); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (27 Jun) ehird violated R1742 by not acting in accordance with section 11 of the Protection Racket agreement when he posted a pledge allowing anyone to act on eir behalf. CFJ 2036: Called by comex (24 Jun); Judged by Wooble (06 Jul) Murphy took all of the AFO's assets. CFJ 2035: Called by Goethe (24 Jun); Judged FALSE by Wooble (12 Jul) If the previous CFJ is found TRUE, its judge CAN and SHOULD award comex the Patent Title Scamster by announcement. CFJ 2034: Called by Goethe (24 Jun); Judged TRUE by Wooble (12 Jul) comex has shown great enthusiasm, persistence, or skill in the perpetrating of scams. CFJ 2033: Called by Quazie (24 Jun); Judged TRUE by Murphy (24 Jun) The Agoran Agricultural Association is a contest CFJ 2032: Called by comex (23 Jun); Judged FALSE by woggle (01 Jul) The hypothetical contract in the evidence section, if made a contest, would be effective, because neither Rule 101 (vi.) nor Rule 478 would prevent its operation. CFJ 2031: Called by ais523 (23 Jun); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Taral (05 Jul) ehird violated rule 2149 by knowingly or recklessly making a false statement. CFJ 2030: Called by woggle (23 Jun); Judged FALSE by ais523 (24 Jun) It is possible for ehird to cause woggle to vote by announcing 'On behalf of woggle: woggle retracts eir votes on proposal 5568 and votes AGAINST x 6 on proposal 5568'. CFJ 2029: Called by Quazie (23 Jun); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (24 Jun) As a result of removing 3 points from Quazie on Jun 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM BobTHJ must create a mill, other than land #98, in Quazie's possession or BobTHJ is in violation of the AAA contract CFJ 2028: Called by root (23 Jun); Judged GUILTY by ais523 (03 Jul) the Reformed Bank of Agora violated R2144 by registering while having the same basis (BobTHJ and Ivan Hope CXXVII) as the Protection Racket, a registered player. CFJ 2027: Called by Ivan Hope (22 Jun); Judged FALSE by ais523 (15 Jul); OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal (15 Aug) The Notary is the recordkeepor of public contracts. CFJ 2026: Called by root (22 Jun); Judged FALSE by Wooble (22 Jun); REMANDED on Appeal (24 Jun); Judged TRUE by Wooble (01 Jul) The Left Hand is a public contract. CFJ 2025: Called by tusho (20 Jun); Judged SLIPPERY by ais523 (23 Jun) comex violated rule 2149 by lying in the quoted message. CFJ 2024: Called by tusho (20 Jun); Judged FALSE by BobTHJ (22 Jun) comex deregistered sometime around or on Thursday, June 19th, 2008 at 8:06:36pm MDT. CFJ 2023: Called by ais523 (20 Jun); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (20 Jul) root broke rule 1742 by failing to act in accordance with the Brainfuck Golf contract. CFJ 2022: Called by Murphy (20 Jun); Judged GUILTY by woggle (21 Jun) comex violated Rule 1504 by failing to publish an apology for CFJ 1942. CFJ 2021: Called by ais523 (20 Jun); Judged FALSE by Quazie (16 Jul) If an entity is both a public message and a forum, it is necessarily a public forum. CFJ 2020: Called by Ivan Hope (20 Jun); Judged GUILTY by comex (22 Jun); AFFIRMED on Appeal (24 Jun) BobTHJ violated Rule 2158 by judging CFJ 2005 UNDECIDABLE. CFJ 2019: Called by Quazie (21 Jun); Judged FALSE by ais523 (23 Jun); REMANDED on Appeal (12 Aug); Judged FALSE by ais523 (15 Aug) Human Point Two bears the patent title Minister Without Portfolio CFJ 2017: Called by tusho (17 Jun); Judged FALSE by Quazie (02 Jul) I am a first-class partnership. CFJ 2016: Called by Zefram (17 Jun); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Taral (01 Jul) Quazie violated rule 2149 by publicly claiming in message that Echidna and Typhon are coauthors (or a coauthor) of the proposal that e submitted in that message. CFJ 2015: Called by Quazie (17 Jun); Judged TRUE by Pavitra (18 Jun) BobTHJ successfully created land #98 in Quazie's possession On or about Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:59 PM. CFJ 2014: Called by Quazie (17 Jun); Judged FALSE by cdm014 (18 Jun) If ehrid was able to act on my behalf at the time CFJ 1999 and CFJ 2000 were called one or more of the set of {CFJ 1999, CFJ 2000} would've been TRUE. CFJ 2013: Called by Ivan Hope (17 Jun); Judged FALSE by Wooble (18 Jun) Rule 2141 implies that a rule can destroy the universe. CFJ 2012: Called by BobTHJ (16 Jun); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (25 Jun); REMANDED on Appeal (03 Jul); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (04 Jul) comex breached Rule 1742 by continued failure to comply with the terms of the binding Equation of CFJ 1915 CFJ 2011: Called by BobTHJ (16 Jun); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (25 Jun); REMANDED on Appeal (03 Jul); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (04 Jul) comex breached Rule 1742 by continued failure to comply with the terms of the binding Vote Market contract. CFJ 2010: Called by ais523 (15 Jun); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Taral (19 Jul) OscarMeyr violated rule 2149 by claiming there was "nothing to see here" when in fact there was. CFJ 2009: Called by Ivan Hope (13 Jun); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Murphy (21 Jun) Ivan Hope violated rule 1742 by initiating this CFJ. CFJ 2008: Called by Wooble (13 Jun); Judged FALSE by Murphy (21 Jun) Ehird deregistered on June 13, 2008, at or around 19:31 UTC CFJ 2007: Called by root (13 Jun); Judged FALSE by Murphy (17 Jun) Ivan Hope CXXVII is in the chokey. CFJ 2006: Called by avpx (13 Jun); Judged FALSE by Goethe (26 Jun) ehird's vote in the Assessor election is valid. CFJ 2005: Called by tusho (13 Jun); Judged UNDECIDABLE by BobTHJ (16 Jun); OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal (21 Jun) Schrodinger's Cat is a player. CFJ 2004: Called by Murphy (10 Jun); Judged UNIMPUGNED by OscarMeyr (17 Jun) Ivan Hope breached Rule 2149 (Truthfulness) by saying "By the way, did I mention I didn't have 50 pens in the first place, so you just gave me free stuff?" while believing e did have at least 50 pens at the time (on or about Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:11:46 -0400) e claimed to transfer 50 pens to comex. CFJ 2003: Called by comex (10 Jun); Judged SLIPPERY by Taral (21 Jun) Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton breached rule 101 by failing to treat Agora right good forever CFJ 2002: Called by Pavitra (10 Jun); Judged TRUE by Wooble (13 Jun) Rule 2193 is at least one of: (1) a Monster; (2) the Monster. CFJ 2001: Called by Ivan Hope (10 Jun); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (22 Jun) Murphy violated rule 1871 by rotating the bench while the Pineapple Partnership is qualified to judge. CFJ 2000: Called by Quazie (09 Jun); Judged FALSE by Murphy (17 Jun) ehird was deregistered when ehrid posted the following message: "I perform the following action on behalf of Quazie: {I deregister.}" CFJ 1999: Called by Quazie (09 Jun); Judged FALSE by Murphy (17 Jun) Quazie was deregistered when ehrid posted the following message: "I perform the following action on behalf of Quazie: {I deregister.}" CFJ 1998: Called by Quazie (09 Jun); Judged TRUE by Wooble (17 Jun) No change will occur to the OBJECTIONABLE contract based on comex's statement: 'Without 3 OBJECTIONS (I don't have any, for that matter), I hereby amend the OBJECTIONABLE contract to read: {{ 1. Any person can join this contract by announcement. 2. Any person other than Quazie can leave this contract by announcement. 3. Any person other than Quazie can perform any action on behalf of Quazie by announcement. }}' regardless of the number of objections that occur CFJ 1997: Called by Quazie (09 Jun); Judged TRUE by Wooble (17 Jun) The following two statements have different meanings, 1 - Without 3 OBJECTIONS, I hereby amend the OBJECTIONABLE contract to read: {{ 1. Any person can join this contract by announcement. 2. Any person other than Quazie can leave this contract by announcement. 3. Any person other than Quazie can perform any action on behalf of Quazie by announcement. }} 2 - Without 3 objections , I hereby amend the OBJECTIONABLE contract to read: {{ 1. Any person can join this contract by announcement. 2. Any person other than Quazie can leave this contract by announcement. 3. Any person other than Quazie can perform any action on behalf of Quazie by announcement. }} CFJ 1996: Called by Murphy (09 Jun); Judged TRUE by Ivan Hope (27 Jun) On or about Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:03:27 -0400, comex gave Ivan Hope 50 pens CFJ 1995: Called by Murphy (09 Jun); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (17 Jun) Ivan Hope breached Rule 2149 (Truthfulness) by claiming (on or about Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:11:46 -0400) to give comex 50 pens. CFJ 1994: Called by ais523 (09 Jun); Judged TRUE by root (21 Jun) The PerlNomic Partnership has voted FOR on the Agoran decision on whether to adopt proposal 5545. CFJ 1993: Called by ais523 (09 Jun); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (20 Jun) Murphy breached rule 2158 by failing to recuse the judicial panel of comex, Pavitra and pikhq with cause. CFJ 1992: Called by Quazie (09 Jun); Judged TRUE by Ivan Hope (13 Jun) It is an entity, where the aforementioned 'it' is any thing. CFJ 1991: Called by ais523 (07 Jun); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (09 Jun) ehird has apologised as required by the judgement of the question on sentencing of CFJ 1943. CFJ 1990: Called by root (07 Jun); Judged TRUE by Ivan Hope (13 Jun) The CotC CAN assign a poorly qualified player to judge a case. CFJ 1989: Called by root (07 Jun); Judged FALSE by Ivan Hope (13 Jun) All actions are regulated. CFJ 1988: Called by Ivan Hope (07 Jun); Judged UNDETERMINED by Murphy (09 Jun) It's an entity. CFJ 1987: Called by Ivan Hope (06 Jun); Judged TRUE by comex (13 Jun) The Lost and Found Department owns the oddball {2/3,3/4} CFJ 1986: Called by Ivan Hope (06 Jun); Judged FALSE by comex (13 Jun) Ivan Hope CXXVII owns the oddball {2/3,3/4} CFJ 1985: Called by comex (05 Jun); Judged FALSE by Pavitra (13 Jun) The first paragraph of Rule 1586 has no effect. CFJ 1984: Called by comex (04 Jun); Judged IRRELEVANT by root (06 Jun); AFFIRMED on Appeal (22 Jun) At least one of the following statements is true: - War is Peace. - Freedom is Slavery. - Ignorance is Strength. CFJ 1983: Called by ais523 (31 May); Judged TRUE by Murphy (09 Jun) There is a CFJ with ID number 1934 CFJ 1982: Called by tusho (30 May); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Wooble (05 Jun) comex CAN initiate an equity case concerning the Gnarlier Contract CFJ 1981: Called by comex (30 May); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (01 Jun) If I am judged GUILTY in CFJ 1935, a sentence other than DISCHARGE is appropriate CFJ 1980: Called by ais523 (29 May); Judged UNDECIDABLE by comex (03 Jun) comex CAN initiate an equity case concerning the Gnarlier Contract CFJ 1979: Called by woggle (29 May); Judged FALSE by root (30 May) When CFJ 1972 was called, it was possible for Pavitra to make Kiwi into a contest without 3 objections. CFJ 1978: Called by woggle (28 May); Judged FALSE by Ivan Hope (03 Jun) Wooble has a Cyan ribbon. CFJ 1977: Called by Pavitra (26 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (29 May) If a player announces "I pledge {this is the Pear contract}; the following sentence has no effect. I pledge {this is the Papaya contract}; the preceding sentence has no effect.", and no attempt is made to dissolve the Pear contract, then another player CAN join the Pear contract by announcement. CFJ 1976: Called by tusho (26 May); Judged TRUE by Pavitra (27 May); OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal (13 Jun) ais523 could, at the time this CFJ was called, leave The Gnarly Contract by announcement CFJ 1975: Called by ais523 (26 May); Judged TRUE by Pavitra (27 May); OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal (13 Jun) ais523 could, at the time this CFJ was called, leave The Gnarly Contract by announcement CFJ 1974: Called by comex (23 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (29 May) When CFJ 1972 was called, it was possible for Pavrita to leave Kiwi. CFJ 1973: Called by Pavitra (22 May); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Wooble (23 May); OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal (02 Jul) Pavitra is a party to Kiwi. CFJ 1972: Called by Pavitra (22 May); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Wooble (23 May); OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal (02 Jul) Pavitra is a party to Mango. CFJ 1971: Called by ais523 (22 May); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (25 May) It is possible to take a game action even in a message which includes the disclaimer in the evidence section. CFJ 1970: Called by tusho (22 May); Judged IRRELEVANT by Murphy (23 May) "A few CFJs" accurately describes the amount of CFJs I have recently called. CFJ 1969: Called by tusho (22 May); Judged IRRELEVANT by Murphy (23 May) "A few CFJs" accurately describes the amount of CFJs I have recently called. CFJ 1968: Called by tusho (22 May); Judged IRRELEVANT by Murphy (23 May) "A few CFJs" accurately describes the amount of CFJs I have recently called. CFJ 1967: Called by tusho (22 May); Judged IRRELEVANT by Murphy (23 May) "A few CFJs" accurately describes the amount of CFJs I have recently called. CFJ 1966: Called by comex (22 May); Judged TRUE by Ivan Hope (26 May); REMANDED on Appeal (30 May); Judged TRUE by Ivan Hope (02 Jun); OVERTURNED on Appeal (13 Jun); Judged TRUE by Pavitra (14 Jun); OVERTURNED on Appeal (24 Jun); Judged FALSE by Wooble (26 Jun) R101 item i. reads: i. The map being obviously the most important rule, every person has the right to move it back up to the top of the ruleset if the Rulekeepor put it down near the bottom again. CFJ 1965: Called by ais523 (22 May); Judged FALSE by comex (29 May) ehird's Announcement of Chaos caused at least one contract to terminate. CFJ 1964: Called by Ivan Hope (21 May); Judged UNIMPUGNED by comex (08 Jun) Ivan Hope violated rule 2149 by making a public statement that two plus two is five. CFJ 1963: Called by tusho (20 May); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (30 May) Ivan Hope violated Rule 2173 by revealing the text of that private contract. CFJ 1962: Called by ais523 (20 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (23 May) In the quoted message, ehird sent an infinite number of messages. CFJ 1961: Called by Goethe (20 May); Judged TRUE by Pavitra (26 May) Proposal A is distributed and is filibustered (and remains filibustered) during emergency session; given no rule changes, a week and a day later, a vote cast on it may be valid. CFJ 1960: Called by ais523 (20 May); Judged FALSE by Ivan Hope (22 May) If a player's voting limit on an Agoran decision reduces during that decision's voting period, then all votes that that player has already cast on that decision are no longer valid. CFJ 1959: Called by ais523 (20 May); Judged FALSE by Ivan Hope (22 May) If a player's voting limit on an Agoran decision reduces during that decision's voting period, then all votes that that player has already cast on that decision are still valid. CFJ 1958: Called by Murphy (20 May); Judged TRUE by Wooble (22 May) There exists at least one rule with Power = 1. CFJ 1957: Called by Ivan Hope (19 May); Judged FALSE by Wooble (09 Jun) There is a pen that owns at least 1 crumpet. CFJ 1956: Called by Ivan Hope (19 May); Judged FALSE by Wooble (09 Jun) There is a pen that owns at least 5 crumpets. CFJ 1955: Called by comex (15 May); Judged FALSE by Goethe (16 May) If Rule 101 gives me the right to perform an action in this game, but the Rules do not define a mechanism for performing that action, I can perform it by announcement. CFJ 1954: Called by tusho (14 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (18 May) In the message archived at the URL , ehird won the game. CFJ 1953: Called by Goethe (13 May); Judged FALSE by ais523 (16 May) A individual player may be found GUILTY in a criminal case for an action performed by a judicial panel of which e is a member, if the judicial panel performs the action as described in R2157. CFJ 1952: Called by Goethe (13 May); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Ivan Hope (16 May) comex violated Rule 101(vii) and Goethe's defined rights by initiating a criminal case against Goethe, when Goethe is already being punished for the same single action (by having to defend emself in a separate, previously-initiated criminal case). CFJ 1951: Called by comex (13 May); Judged UNIMPUGNED by root (13 Jun) Goethe violated Rule 217 by submitting a judgement (on behalf of an appeal panel) for the appeal case CFJ 1932a. CFJ 1950: Called by root (13 May); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (30 May) Wooble breached Rule 2157 by failing to ensure that the panel met all of its obligations in appeal case 1932a. Specifically, the panel failed to meet its obligation to assign an appropriate judgement in that case. CFJ 1949: Called by root (13 May); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (30 May) Murphy breached Rule 2157 by failing to ensure that the panel met all of its obligations in appeal case 1932a. Specifically, the panel failed to meet its obligation to assign an appropriate judgement in that case. CFJ 1948: Called by root (13 May); Judged INNOCENT by OscarMeyr (30 May) Goethe breached Rule 2157 by failing to ensure that the panel met all of its obligations in appeal case 1932a. Specifically, the panel failed to meet its obligation to assign an appropriate judgement in that case. CFJ 1947: Called by Goethe (13 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (16 May) If an appealed equity case judgement is REMANDED or REASSIGNED, the original (prior) judgement remains a binding agreement. CFJ 1946: Called by ais523 (09 May); Judged FALSE by Goethe (12 May) In the message found at , ihope agreed to something. CFJ 1945: Called by tusho (09 May); Judged INNOCENT by ais523 (14 May) Wooble violated Rule 101 by alienating new players by insulting eir religion. CFJ 1944: Called by Blaise Pascal (09 May); Judged FALSE by Pavitra (26 May) If I were to post to a public forum any of the following statements, I would be a player: 1. I am a player. 2. I declare myself to be a player. CFJ 1943: Called by Wooble (09 May); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (30 May) ehird breached Rule 1742 by not acting in accordance with eir obligations under the Ducks & Platypuses agreement, by being a party to that agreement. CFJ 1942: Called by Wooble (09 May); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (30 May) comex breached Rule 1742 by not acting in accordance with eir obligations under the Ducks & Platypuses agreement, by being a party to that agreement. CFJ 1941: Called by Ivan Hope (08 May); Judged TRUE by Murphy (16 May) A contract can allow arbitrary persons to act on behalf of its parties. CFJ 1940: Called by Ivan Hope (08 May); Judged GUILTY by Wooble (13 May) Ivan Hope violated Rule 1742 by not transferring one pen to Murphy as soon as possible after making this pledge. CFJ 1939: Called by ais523 (08 May); Judged FALSE by Goethe (16 May) If a rule states that an action is regulated, that does not prevent that action from taking place, but only prevents that thing from taking place under rule 101(ii) (and therefore makes it impossible to take that action unless another rule makes it possible). CFJ 1938: Called by Wooble (07 May); Judged INNOCENT by comex (28 May) ais523 violated Rule 2158 by assigning an inappropriate judgement to CFJ 1932. CFJ 1937: Called by woggle (07 May); Judged FALSE by Wooble (08 May); REMANDED on Appeal (21 May); Judged FALSE by Wooble (05 Jun) root is the contestmaster of the equation of CFJ1932. CFJ 1936: Called by Wooble (07 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (16 May); AFFIRMED on Appeal (13 Jun) The judge in an equity case CAN make the equation a contest by stating it is one. CFJ 1935: Called by Wooble (07 May); Judged OVERLOOKED by ais523 (20 May); AFFIRMED on Appeal (14 Jun) comex violated Rule 1742 by failing to act in accordance with eir obligations under the CFJ 1915 equation. CFJ 1934: Called by ais523 (04 May); Judged IRRELEVANT by Pavitra (31 May) Hello! CFJ 1933: Called by Goethe (02 May); Judged FALSE by Ivan Hope (02 Jun) Due to the LAND GRAB pledge, Goethe is the recordkeeper for the types of crops currencies referenced by the Agoran Agricultural Association contract. CFJ 1932: Called by root (29 Apr); Judged by ais523 (07 May); OVERTURNED on Appeal (13 May); Judged by tusho (16 May) I haven't left the contract at my first opportunity, as is expected of me. CFJ 1931: Called by comex (28 Apr); Judged FALSE by Goethe (08 May) IRCNomic is a public contract. CFJ 1930: Called by ais523 (28 Apr); Judged TRUE by root (08 May) It is impossible for a player to become Referee within the meaning of the public contract that is the backing document for XP without failing to do something that its paragraph 8 specifies that the Referee SHALL do in that situation, under the current set of rules. CFJ 1929: Called by comex (26 Apr); Judged INNOCENT by Murphy (08 May) comex breached Rule 1742 by claiming that contract R requires that we "*pretend*" that it's a rule, which is not treating it like a rule, but rather a pretend rule, thereby violating its terms CFJ 1927: Called by BobTHJ (18 Apr); Judged by Wooble (07 May) comex has failed to submit Sell Tickets as required by section 2 of this Equation. The other parties have failed to suggest suitable tickets as required in section 3 of the equation. CFJ 1926: Called by Goethe (11 Apr); Judged FALSE by Murphy (25 Apr) If a pledge contains no explicit exit clause, a party may leave it by announcement. CFJ 1925: Called by woggle (11 Apr); Judged TRUE by Iammars (20 Apr); REMANDED on Appeal (01 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (18 May) In eir report, the Notary is required to list Agora's Child as a member of the set of parties to a public contract concerning Trouts and Jester's Caps. CFJ 1924: Called by comex (10 Apr); Judged FALSE by Goethe (25 Apr) The message in the evidence section (1) would be invalid because "30 days, or until e updates the player list..." is not a valid duration (ignoring any other problems with the message) CFJ 1923: Called by Murphy (04 Apr); Judged FALSE by root (22 Apr) pikhq has a bean. CFJ 1922: Called by Murphy (04 Apr); Judged FALSE by root (22 Apr) Murphy has at least one bean. CFJ 1921: Called by Goethe (02 Apr); Judged TRUE by Iammars (03 May) If I publish the following statement 'I'll give a quatloo to you, comex, if you give me a dingbat', and quatloos and dingbats are Agoran quantities, and comex publishes 'Okay' in reference to the statement, it forms a binding agreement (a contract). CFJ 1920: Called by comex (01 Apr); Judged FALSE by Goethe (07 Apr) If the offer in the evidence section (1) were published by me, then accepted, any person would be able to become a party to the resultant contract by announcement. CFJ 1919: Called by Iammars (27 Mar); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (09 Apr) pikhq breached Rule 2135 by neglecting his duty to update the Nomic Wiki page in the month of February. CFJ 1918: Called by Iammars (27 Mar); Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr (09 Apr) pikhq breached Rule 2135 by misrepresenting Agora on the Nomic Wiki by failing to include my name in the players list. CFJ 1917: Called by Ivan Hope (22 Mar); Judged GUILTY by Iammars (03 Apr) Goethe violated rule 2143 by not publishing a Notary report last month. CFJ 1916: Called by comex (13 Mar); Judged FALSE by Zefram (13 Mar) In the quoted message, Iammars consented to something. CFJ 1915: Called by BobTHJ (11 Mar); Judged by woggle (27 Mar) comex has breached the Vote Market agreement by failing to restore his VP to a level at or above 50 within 60 days of when it first fell below that threshold. CFJ 1914: Called by comex (11 Mar); Judged TRUE by Ivan Hope (12 Apr) Rule 2166 exists. CFJ 1913: Called by comex (10 Mar); Judged FALSE by Murphy (30 Mar) Bob is a first-class person. CFJ 1912: Called by comex (10 Mar); Judged FALSE by Murphy (30 Mar) Bob is a player. CFJ 1911: Called by comex (10 Mar); Judged FALSE by Murphy (30 Mar) Bob is a person. CFJ 1910: Called by root (10 Mar); Judged TRUE by Murphy (15 Mar) One or more partnerships exist. CFJ 1909: Called by woggle (02 Mar); Judged FALSE by Iammars (12 Mar) CFJ 1903a has been judged. CFJ 1908: Called by woggle (02 Mar); Judged FALSE by Iammars (12 Mar) A concurring opinion has been published by the judicial panel in CFJ 1903a. CFJ 1907: Called by comex (18 Feb); Judged GUILTY by Zefram (07 Mar) pikhq violated Rule 208 by failing to resolve eir intent to appeal CFJ 1856. CFJ 1906: Called by Zefram (08 Feb); Judged GUILTY by Wooble (18 Feb) comex violated rule 2149 by claiming in message <6bf32280802080851i14c79ea9oa8fc2768a80bc7af@mail.gmail.com> that proposal 5419 passed while not believing that to be true. CFJ 1905: Called by comex (07 Feb); Judged FALSE by Murphy (16 Feb) There is a Rule 9999. CFJ 1904: Called by pikhq (07 Feb); Judged INNOCENT by Iammars (22 Feb) comex violated Rule 2149/8, Truthfulness, by falsely claiming that there exists a rule 9999. CFJ 1903: Called by Pavitra (06 Feb); Judged FALSE by Goethe (07 Feb); AFFIRMED on Appeal (16 Mar) The above question initiated an inquiry case. CFJ 1902: Called by Levi (05 Feb); Judged TRUE by comex (20 Feb) Making the public statement 'This statement is not true' would cause the person making that statement to violate Rule 2149. CFJ 1901: Called by comex (04 Feb); Judged TRUE by Zefram (05 Feb) Y is a contract. CFJ 1900: Called by Murphy (03 Feb); Judged FALSE by Goethe (21 Feb) Zefram CAN register. CFJ 1899: Called by Murphy (03 Feb); Judged FALSE by Goethe (22 Feb) BobTHJ CAN register. CFJ 1898: Called by Murphy (03 Feb); Judged TRUE by Goethe (21 Feb) Zefram is a player. CFJ 1897: Called by comex (03 Feb); Judged FALSE by BobTHJ (26 Feb); OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal (19 Mar) BobTHJ is a player CFJ 1896: Called by comex (03 Feb); Judged FALSE by Murphy (03 Feb); OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal (04 Feb) There exists a R2160 'position' that is not an office CFJ 1895: Called by comex (03 Feb); Judged FALSE by Goethe (22 Feb) BobTHJ is an R2160 'position' CFJ 1894: Called by Zefram (03 Feb); Judged TRUE by pikhq (04 Feb) an inquiry case CAN be initiated with a question taking the role of the statement to be inquired into CFJ 1893: Called by root (03 Feb); Judged FALSE by Wooble (04 Feb) comex successfully caused at least one player other than emself to cast a vote on Proposal 5419. CFJ 1892: Called by pikhq (02 Feb); Judged FALSE by Goethe (04 Feb) comex's non-binding agreement 'X' is a contract. CFJ 1891: Called by Goethe (02 Feb); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (22 Feb); REMANDED on Appeal (19 Apr); Judged FALSE by Wooble (01 May) If the Speaker fails to assign prerogatives for the upcoming month in the seven days before the beginning of a month, e CAN assign prerogatives (for that month) after the month has begun. CFJ 1890: Called by Goethe (02 Feb); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (22 Feb); REMANDED on Appeal (19 Apr); Judged FALSE by Wooble (01 May) The Speaker CAN assign prerogatives for the upcoming month in the seven days before the beginning of a month. CFJ 1889: Called by Wooble (01 Feb); Judged UNIMPUGNED by woggle (11 Feb) Zefram violated Rule 2149 in the above message by making the statement "I intend to deputise for BobTHJ to deregister em." while not reasonably believing it to be true. CFJ 1888: Called by pikhq (31 Jan); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (01 Feb) The above message was a public message. CFJ 1887: Called by Levi (30 Jan); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (01 Feb) Making the public statement 'This statement is a lie' would cause the person making that statement to violate Rule 2149. CFJ 1886: Called by Murphy (28 Jan); Judged by Zefram (11 Feb) BobTHJ has not deregistered. CFJ 1885: Called by Taral (26 Jan); Judged TRUE by Zefram (31 Jan) Eris' votes of ROOT on Proposal 5412 were valid. CFJ 1884: Called by BobTHJ (26 Jan); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Murphy (26 Jan) Where the above referenced decision on amending the Vote Market agreement able to be validly resolved as of the calling of this CFJ would pikhq's vote of OBJECT be valid? CFJ 1883: Called by BobTHJ (26 Jan); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Murphy (26 Jan) Where the above referenced decision on amending the Vote Market agreement able to be validly resolved as of the calling of this CFJ would Pavitra's vote of OBJECT be valid? CFJ 1882: Called by comex (25 Jan); Judged TRUE by woggle (29 Jan); REMANDED on Appeal (30 Jan); Judged TRUE by woggle (05 Feb) watcher is a Player CFJ 1881: Called by pikhq (25 Jan); Judged FALSE by comex (07 Feb) rule 2029 requires Agorans to always Dance a Powerful Dance. CFJ 1880: Called by comex (22 Jan); Judged TRUE by Iammars (30 Jan) The Agoran Agricultural Association is a contract. CFJ 1879: Called by pikhq (19 Jan); Judged FALSE by Taral (29 Jan); REMANDED on Appeal (07 Feb); Judged FALSE by Wooble (05 Mar) Canada is a nomic. CFJ 1878: Called by woggle (18 Jan); Judged FALSE by root (23 Jan) It is possible to, by announcement, cease to be a party to a contract which has exactly 1 party and which is both a location and a pledge when the contract explicitly permits this. CFJ 1877: Called by woggle (18 Jan); Judged FALSE by root (23 Jan) It is possible to cease to be a party to a location which has exactly 1 party by announcement when the text of the location explicitly permits this. CFJ 1876: Called by woggle (18 Jan); Judged FALSE by root (23 Jan) It is possible to cease to be a party to a pledge which has exactly 1 party by announcement when the text of pledge explicitly permits this. CFJ 1875: Called by Levi (15 Jan); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (25 Jan) Levi is The Speaker. CFJ 1874: Called by Levi (15 Jan); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (25 Jan) Murphy is The Speaker. CFJ 1873: Called by Levi (15 Jan); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (25 Jan) Human Point Two Bears the patent title Minister Without Portfolio. CFJ 1872: Called by pikhq (15 Jan); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (15 Jan) The Vote Market is a contract. CFJ 1871: Called by Goethe (15 Jan); Judged FALSE by Zefram (18 Jan) If a judge makes the right judgement but for the wrong reasons, then e has made an inappropriate judgement. CFJ 1870: Called by Zefram (15 Jan); Judged FALSE by pikhq (15 Jan); REMANDED on Appeal (15 Jan); Judged TRUE by pikhq (16 Jan) where a prerogative has been assigned to a person for a particular month, and no assignment of prerogatives has yet been made for the following month, that person loses that prerogative at the end of that month CFJ 1869: Called by pikhq (15 Jan); Judged FALSE by Murphy (15 Jan) it is possible to join the Vote Market while already a member of the Vote Market. CFJ 1868: Called by BobTHJ (14 Jan); Judged INNOCENT by pikhq (16 Jan) woggle breached Rule 911 by assigning an inappropriate judgment to CFJ 1860a. CFJ 1867: Called by BobTHJ (14 Jan); Judged INNOCENT by pikhq (16 Jan) root breached Rule 911 by assigning an inappropriate judgment to CFJ 1860a. CFJ 1866: Called by BobTHJ (14 Jan); Judged INNOCENT by pikhq (16 Jan) Murphy breached Rule 911 by assigning an inappropriate judgment to CFJ 1860a. CFJ 1865: Called by Zefram (14 Jan); Judged FALSE by root (14 Jan) the Patent Title of Champion CAN be awarded by announcement of the Herald to a person who has not won the game CFJ 1864: Called by root (12 Jan); Judged TRUE by Taral (21 Jan) The Left Hand is a partnership. CFJ 1863: Called by Zefram (10 Jan); Judged EXCUSED by Goethe (14 Jan); REMANDED on Appeal (21 Jan); Judged EXCUSED by Goethe (29 Jan) BobTHJ violated rule 2158 by failing to assign an appropriate judgement to the question on veracity in CFJ 1860 when obliged to, by means of assigning an inappropriate judgement instead. CFJ 1862: Called by Murphy (10 Jan); Judged FALSE by Iammars (17 Jan) Human Point Two bears the Patent Title of Minister Without Portfolio. CFJ 1861: Called by Iammars (08 Jan); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (16 Jan) Players may always be referred to by eir legal name along with eir nickname. CFJ 1860: Called by pikhq (08 Jan); Judged IRRELEVANT by BobTHJ (10 Jan); OVERTURNED on Appeal (14 Jan); Judged FALSE by Iammars (21 Jan) It is a violation of rule 2159 to falsely claim that something is a protective decree to Steve Wallace (the biological person, not necessarily the player). CFJ 1859: Called by comex (01 Jan); Judged FALSE by Murphy (08 Jan) At least one of the votes in root's message with message-id <3fc761710712310956p646fddd3h9ca3b5ceb0c16fe4@mail.gmail.com> is valid. CFJ 1858: Called by woggle (31 Dec); Judged UNAWARE by pikhq (07 Jan); OVERRULED to GUILTY on Appeal (14 Jan) root violated rule 1769 by assigning, during a Holiday, judgement to the judicial question on culpability in CFJ 1838 in the above-quoted message. CFJ 1857: Called by woggle (31 Dec); Judged UNAWARE by pikhq (07 Jan); OVERRULED to GUILTY on Appeal (14 Jan) root violated rule 1769 by assigning, during a Holiday, judgement to the judicial question on culpability in CFJ 1837 in the above-quoted message. CFJ 1856: Called by Zefram (29 Dec); Judged FALSE by Goethe (08 Jan) Steve Wallace is a player CFJ 1855: Called by pikhq (29 Dec); Judged FALSE by woggle (15 Jan) The AFO is not part of the basis of Agora's Child, but is a partner of Agora's Child. CFJ 1854: Called by avpx (24 Dec); Judged FALSE by root (14 Jan) It is possible to spend VCs that one does not own. CFJ 1853: Called by Goethe (23 Dec); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Taral (14 Jan) comex has violated Rule 2149 in his communication of voting on proposal 5380. CFJ 1852: Called by Goethe (23 Dec); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Taral (14 Jan) comex has violated Rule 2149 in his communication of voting on proposal 5375. CFJ 1851: Called by Murphy (22 Dec); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (10 Jan) Proposal 5373 was adopted in Message-ID: <476D30DB.6040804@socal.rr.com> CFJ 1850: Called by Murphy (22 Dec); Judged FALSE by root (07 Jan) pikhq won in Message-Id: <200712202153.34050.josiahw@gmail.com> CFJ 1849: Called by Zefram (21 Dec); Judged GUILTY by Taral (09 Jan); AFFIRMED on Appeal (14 Jan) BobTHJ violated rule 2149 by publishing in message <56732cfd0712210825i54c896f7n9f4795405528894e@mail.gmail.com> a statement that e did not believe was true. CFJ 1848: Called by Murphy (21 Dec); Judged FALSE by Zefram (21 Dec) Futuremyartug is a player. CFJ 1847: Called by Zefram (20 Dec); Judged FALSE by comex (20 Dec) when a person calls for judgement, and has already done so at least five times in the same week, e is awarded one blue mark by section (+b) of rule 2176 CFJ 1846: Called by BobTHJ (20 Dec); Judged FALSE by pikhq (21 Dec); OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal (07 Jan) The sentence issued by BobTHJ (prior to appeal) in CFJ 1812 included a valid set of prescribed words. CFJ 1845: Called by Murphy (20 Dec); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (09 Jan) comex initiated two criminal cases in Message-Id: <200712181706.58039.comexk@gmail.com> CFJ 1844: Called by pikhq (20 Dec); Judged TRUE by Iammars (07 Jan) submitting a protective decree to Steve Wallace is a violation of rule 2159. CFJ 1843: Called by WALRUS (20 Dec); Judged FALSE by Goethe (20 Dec) It is possible for joining a contract to take effect retroactively. CFJ 1842: Called by WALRUS (20 Dec); Judged UNDETERMINED by Goethe (20 Dec) It is possible for a contract change to take effect retroactively. CFJ 1841: Called by WALRUS (20 Dec); Judged TRUE by Goethe (20 Dec) It is possible for a game action to take effect retroactively. CFJ 1840: Called by pikhq (20 Dec); Judged TRUE by Murphy (20 Dec); OVERTURNED on Appeal (31 Dec); Judged FALSE by Zefram (14 Jan) WALRUS is a player. CFJ 1839: Called by pikhq (20 Dec); Judged INNOCENT by Iammars (07 Jan) Zefram violated Rule 2149/8. ("A person SHALL NOT make a public statement unless e believes in doing so e is telling the truth.") In message <20071219230243.GL17928@fysh.org>, Zefram claimed that the attempt to register WALRUS was ineffective, since 'WALRUS does not adequately identify any particular entity'. CFJ 1838: Called by comex (19 Dec); Judged SLIPPERY by root (20 Dec); REMANDED on Appeal (21 Dec); Judged INNOCENT by root (31 Dec) BobTHJ breached Rule 2149 by, as a knight, publishing a statement that e believed to be false in eir message with Message-ID <56732cfd0711041449h23dcc500id9e643c76643d597@mail.gmail.com> CFJ 1837: Called by comex (19 Dec); Judged SLIPPERY by root (20 Dec); REMANDED on Appeal (21 Dec); Judged INNOCENT by root (31 Dec) BobTHJ breached Rule 2149 by, as a knight, publishing a statement that e believed to be false in eir message with Message-ID <56732cfd0710291242h67fc331and43dd1076934828@mail.gmail.com> CFJ 1836: Called by comex (18 Dec); Judged FALSE by pikhq (20 Dec); REMANDED on Appeal (20 Dec); Judged FALSE by pikhq (22 Dec); AFFIRMED on Appeal (07 Jan) Fookiemyartug is a player. CFJ 1835: Called by comex (18 Dec); Judged FALSE by Zefram (20 Dec) In this message, comex submitted a CFJ on the statement "Who am I?" CFJ 1834: Called by comex (18 Dec); Judged TRUE by Zefram (20 Dec) In this message, comex submitted a proposal with the text "No, I'm Spartacus!" CFJ 1833: Called by comex (18 Dec); Judged TRUE by Zefram (20 Dec) In this message, comex submitted a CFJ on the statement "I'm Spartacus!" CFJ 1832: Called by comex (15 Dec); Judged by BobTHJ (20 Dec) The AFO violated a contract not to vote on Proposal 5365. CFJ 1831: Called by pikhq (10 Dec); Judged TRUE by Goethe (10 Dec); REMANDED on Appeal (11 Dec); Judged FALSE by Taral (20 Dec); REMANDED on Appeal (20 Jan); Judged FALSE by Iammars (05 Feb) The above was a valid vote on the stability of Rulekeepor. CFJ 1830: Called by comex (09 Dec); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (10 Dec); REMANDED on Appeal (12 Dec); Judged IRRELEVANT by OscarMeyr (13 Dec) There are elephants over there. CFJ 1829: Called by pikhq (08 Dec); Judged FALSE by Wooble (10 Dec) The Accountor is an office. CFJ 1828: Called by Agora's Child (08 Dec); Judged SLIPPERY by comex (20 Dec); REMANDED on Appeal (14 Jan); Judged UNIMPUGNED by comex (21 Jan) pikhq, as Ambassador, is in violation of rule 2159 by claiming the following to be a protective decree to Steve "cheesworshiper" Wallace: "There is now such a thing as a suffusion of yellow." CFJ 1827: Called by Murphy (06 Dec); Judged FALSE by root (20 Dec) The AFO's VVLOP changed 104 times as a result of comex's message with Message-ID <6bf32280711281839g6adde4a4wdf21f00d231c776b@mail.gmail.com> CFJ 1826: Called by Murphy (06 Dec); Judged FALSE by root (20 Dec) The AFO's VVLOP changed as a result of comex's message with Message-ID <6bf32280711281839g6adde4a4wdf21f00d231c776b@mail.gmail.com> CFJ 1825: Called by Levi (05 Dec); Judged by pikhq (10 Dec) Murphy violated a contract to transfer one Green Mark to Levi. CFJ 1824: Called by comex (04 Dec); Judged INNOCENT by Taral (17 Dec) Goethe violated Rule 2149 by recklessly (and falsely) claiming that I violated Rule 2149. CFJ 1823: Called by Goethe (04 Dec); Judged INNOCENT by Taral (17 Dec) comex violated Rule 2149 by recklessly (and falsely) claiming that I recklessly claimed a false thing. CFJ 1822: Called by BobTHJ (04 Dec); Judged TRUE by Zefram (04 Dec) The inclusion or exclusion of invalid votes can invalidate the resolution of an Agoran Decision. CFJ 1821: Called by BobTHJ (04 Dec); Judged FALSE by Zefram (10 Dec) Message-Id <56732cfd0712022332k5826ec06o3b92fd665a1e2751@mail.gmail.com> was a valid resolution of an Agoran Decision. CFJ 1820: Called by comex (04 Dec); Judged INNOCENT by Taral (10 Dec) Goethe violated Rule 2149 by publishing the quoted message (with message-id ). CFJ 1819: Called by pikhq (03 Dec); Judged FALSE by Wooble (04 Dec) On Dec. 3, 2007, Fookiemyartug, comex, and BobTHJ won the game. CFJ 1818: Called by pikhq (02 Dec); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (05 Dec) pikhq won the game. CFJ 1817: Called by pikhq (02 Dec); Judged FALSE by root (05 Dec) Win 1-10 were contests. CFJ 1816: Called by pikhq (02 Dec); Judged FALSE by root (05 Dec) pikhq was able to define dependent contracts via a contract. CFJ 1815: Called by Association of Federated Organizations (02 Dec); Judged TRUE by comex (03 Dec) The AFO is a player and a partnership. CFJ 1814: Called by root (29 Nov); Judged FALSE by Goethe (06 Dec) The AFO won the game as a result of pikhq's message with Message-ID <200711281949.16555.josiahw@gmail.com>. CFJ 1813: Called by root (29 Nov); Judged FALSE by Goethe (06 Dec) The AFO won the game as a result of comex's message with Message-ID <6bf32280711281839g6adde4a4wdf21f00d231c776b@mail.gmail.com>. CFJ 1812: Called by Levi (29 Nov); Judged GUILTY by BobTHJ (04 Dec); OVERRULED to EXCUSED on Appeal (05 Dec) pikhq breached rule 2172 by attempting to register Agora as a B Nomic faction without Agoran Consent. CFJ 1811: Called by pikhq (29 Nov); Judged by comex (16 Dec) Murphy is in breach of our contract concerning marks by not sending me 1 blue mark and 1 black mark. CFJ 1810: Called by Murphy (28 Nov); Judged TRUE by Taral (01 Dec) The AFO resolved the Agoran decisions for Proposals 5293 and 5294 in Message-ID: <4745305E.8090405@socal.rr.com> CFJ 1809: Called by pikhq (28 Nov); Judged TRUE by root (29 Nov) sentencing someone to APOLOGY without giving a set of prescribed words means that the apology has a null set of prescribed words. CFJ 1808: Called by pikhq (28 Nov); Judged TRUE by root (29 Nov) sentencing someone to APOLOGY without giving a set of prescribed words means that the apology has a null set of prescribed words. CFJ 1807: Called by root (25 Nov); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (28 Nov); REMANDED on Appeal (03 Dec); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (07 Dec) root won the game at or around Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:29:13 UTC. CFJ 1806: Called by pikhq (24 Nov); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Zefram (29 Nov); REMANDED on Appeal (01 Dec); Judged UNDETERMINED by Zefram (01 Dec) In rule 2126, spending N+1 or N+2 VCs of different colors means that more than one color must be involved. CFJ 1805: Called by BobTHJ (23 Nov); Judged TRUE by pikhq (28 Nov); OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal (05 Dec) CFJ 1799 is an inquiry case on the permissibility of an action. CFJ 1804: Called by comex (19 Nov); Judged EXCUSED by Goethe (29 Nov) pikhq breached Rule 2158 by assigning an inappropriate judgement to the question on veracity in CFJ 1711 CFJ 1803: Called by Wooble (19 Nov); Judged FALSE by Murphy (23 Nov) B Nomic is a Player. CFJ 1802: Called by Levi (19 Nov); Judged FALSE by Goethe (19 Nov) pikhq obtained Agoran Consent to have Agora join B Nomic as a B Nomic faction CFJ 1801: Called by Levi (19 Nov); Judged TRUE by comex (28 Nov) Agoran Consent is required to have Agora join B Nomic as a B Nomic faction CFJ 1800: Called by Murphy (18 Nov); Judged TRUE by root (27 Nov) Goethe initiated an Agoran decision in Message-id: CFJ 1799: Called by comex (18 Nov); Judged UNDECIDABLE by BobTHJ (23 Nov); AFFIRMED on Appeal (05 Dec) It is permissible to nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjk CFJ 1798: Called by Goethe (16 Nov); Judged TRUE by Zefram (19 Nov) Goethe is a coauthor on the Proposal Contests Fix Mk II CFJ 1797: Called by Murphy (14 Nov); Judged FALSE by pikhq (16 Nov) The Bake The Traitor agreement is fair to all contestants while there are no contestants other than comex. CFJ 1796: Called by Murphy (14 Nov); Judged TRUE by Taral (17 Nov) comex can join the Bake The Traitor agreement. CFJ 1795: Called by comex (13 Nov); Judged TRUE by Murphy (17 Nov) CFJ 1794 is an inquiry case on the possibility of a rule-defined action CFJ 1794: Called by comex (13 Nov); Judged TRUE by Murphy (17 Nov) It is possible for Beverly to deregister. CFJ 1793: Called by comex (13 Nov); Judged FALSE by Goethe (19 Nov) If the announcement of Partnership 1's Contest had been received by the listserver sixty minutes before the announcement dissolving it, all other factors being equal, Partnership 1's Contest would have allowed any first-class player to become a party CFJ 1792: Called by comex (13 Nov); Judged FALSE by Goethe (19 Nov) If the announcement of Partnership 1's Contest had been received by the listserver sixty seconds before the announcement dissolving it, all other factors being equal, Partnership 1's Contest would have allowed any first-class player to become a party CFJ 1791: Called by Murphy (11 Nov); Judged FALSE by root (12 Nov) Eris's VC holdings as reported in the Assessor's report on or about November 3, 2007 have been ratified. CFJ 1790: Called by Murphy (11 Nov); Judged FALSE by root (12 Nov) Zefram's VC holdings as reported in the Assessor's report on or about November 3, 2007 have been ratified. CFJ 1789: Called by Murphy (11 Nov); Judged FALSE by Taral (11 Nov) The Voting Credit holdings reported in the Assessor's report on or about November 3, 2007 have been ratified. CFJ 1788: Called by Murphy (11 Nov); Judged FALSE by root (11 Nov) The Assessor's report published on or about November 3, 2007 has been ratified. CFJ 1787: Called by root (10 Nov); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Murphy (10 Nov); REMANDED on Appeal (13 Nov); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Murphy (17 Nov) It is permissible to judge the question on veracity in this case FALSE. CFJ 1786: Called by Goethe (06 Nov); Judged EXCUSED by Taral (07 Nov); OVERTURNED on Appeal (27 Nov); Judged INNOCENT by Murphy (29 Nov) Goethe, while holding the office of Notary, did breach the terms of eir office contained in Rule 2173 by identifying the membership of the private contract known as the AFO without the consent of its members or as allowed by the contract. CFJ 1785: Called by BobTHJ (05 Nov); Judged GUILTY by Zefram (07 Nov) BobTHJ breached R1504, Criminal Cases, by failing to issue an Apology within 72 hours. CFJ 1784: Called by comex (05 Nov); Judged TRUE by Zefram (19 Nov) The message with subject "BUS: I say I pseudo-judge (fwd)", message-id that purported to judge CFJs 1774 and 1775) had the effect of assigning a judgement. CFJ 1783: Called by Zefram (05 Nov); Judged GUILTY by pikhq (16 Nov) comex breached rule 2149 by knowingly or recklessly claiming, while e was a knight, in message <6bf32280711041554v63a82c17vc2925d02ad455298@mail.gmail.com>, that Fookiemyartug's personness was part of the CotC's weekly report. CFJ 1782: Called by Murphy (04 Nov); Judged TRUE by Goethe (06 Nov) pikhq initiated a criminal case in Message-id: <200711041446.04509.josiahw@gmail.com> CFJ 1781: Called by pikhq (04 Nov); Judged UNIMPUGNED by comex (17 Nov) proposal 5269 was never submitted, and therefore should not have been distributed. Since the Promoter did this without a submission to the proposal pool, he made a proposal outside of rule 106, and is therefore in violation. CFJ 1780: Called by pikhq (04 Nov); Judged FALSE by Zefram (07 Nov) proposal 5269 was not submitted by pikhq, and it was instead authored by the Promoter. CFJ 1779: Called by Zefram (04 Nov); Judged TRUE by comex (07 Nov) Fookiemyartug is a person CFJ 1778: Called by root (04 Nov); Judged FALSE by Murphy (10 Nov) Judging UNDECIDABLE is permissible. CFJ 1777: Called by Zefram (04 Nov); Judged FALSE by Taral (11 Nov); AFFIRMED on Appeal (18 Nov) Partnership 1's Contest allowed any first-class player to become a party CFJ 1776: Called by comex (01 Nov); Judged TRUE by root (06 Nov) It is possible to deputise for the purpose of changing all sitting players to standing CFJ 1775: Called by Murphy (01 Nov); Judged FALSE by Goethe (05 Nov) comex initiated exactly one inquiry case in Message-id: <200710281809.40881.comexk@gmail.com> CFJ 1774: Called by Murphy (01 Nov); Judged TRUE by Goethe (05 Nov) comex did not initiate any inquiry cases in Message-id: <200710281809.40881.comexk@gmail.com> CFJ 1773: Called by Murphy (28 Oct); Judged FALSE by pikhq (04 Nov) comex initiated a criminal case in the message with Message-id: <200710221616.45845.comexk@gmail.com> CFJ 1772: Called by comex (28 Oct); Judged FALSE by Zefram (28 Oct) comex initiated an equity case in eir message dated Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:16:40 -0400 CFJ 1771: Called by Goethe (28 Oct); Judged TRUE by root (04 Nov) If an inquiry case revolves around the interpretation of a specific action, and the caller does not provide, in arguments, evidence, or the statement, one of (a) a direct quote of the action; (b) a link or email reference to the action; or (c) an approximate time and date the action was performed in a specified forum, then the judge is acting reasonably if e judges UNDETERMINED. CFJ 1770: Called by root (23 Oct); Judged FALSE by Zefram (24 Oct) Primo Corporation is a person and a player. CFJ 1769: Called by comex (22 Oct); Judged UNDETERMINED by Goethe (28 Oct) comex has initiated an equity case CFJ 1768: Called by comex (22 Oct); Judged FALSE by Zefram (22 Oct) Rule 2149's obligation on a knights to not publish statements that e believes are false is in conflict with the knight's right of participation in the fora. CFJ 1767: Called by pikhq (21 Oct); Judged FALSE by Taral (21 Oct) When comex gave his consent in agora-discussion (not a public forum) on a panel ruling, this was *not* sufficient to actually be an agreement to the ruling on CFJ 1748a. CFJ 1766: Called by Zefram (16 Oct); Judged TRUE by root (20 Oct) when the CotC has recused with cause a judge who is a non-supine player, and at least a week has passed since the recusal, and the recused player's posture has not changed during that time, the CotC CAN flip that player's posture to supine by announcement CFJ 1765: Called by Zefram (16 Oct); Judged TRUE by root (20 Oct) within the week after the CotC has recused with cause a judge who is a non-supine player, e CAN flip that player's posture to supine by announcement CFJ 1764: Called by comex (07 Oct); Judged TRUE by root (24 Oct) pikhq voted FOR a proposal on or about Sun, 7 Oct 2007 16:19:46 -0600. CFJ 1763: Called by Taral (03 Oct); Judged TRUE by comex (08 Oct) Eris can resolve the Agoran decision e started on 9/17 without violating a rule. CFJ 1762: Called by comex (03 Oct); Judged TRUE by pikhq (07 Oct) The Variety Show does not meet the definition of a contest because it is not fair to all contestants. CFJ 1761: Called by Murphy (30 Sep); Judged FALSE by Zefram (08 Oct) The AFO published the message with Message-id: <46FFFFB9.4070306@socal.rr.com> CFJ 1760: Called by Murphy (30 Sep); Judged TRUE by Zefram (08 Oct) Murphy published the message with Message-id: <46FFFFB9.4070306@socal.rr.com> CFJ 1759: Called by Murphy (30 Sep); Judged TRUE by Zefram (03 Oct) The AFO was the vote collector for the Agoran decision on whether to adopt Proposal 5222 as of the publication of Message-id: <46FFFFB9.4070306@socal.rr.com> CFJ 1758: Called by Murphy (30 Sep); Judged FALSE by Zefram (03 Oct) Murphy was the vote collector for the Agoran decision on whether to adopt Proposal 5222 as of the publication of Message-id: <46FFFFB9.4070306@socal.rr.com> CFJ 1757: Called by root (28 Sep); Judged FALSE by Taral (31 Oct) At or within one minute of Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:49:15 GMT, root initiated a criminal case. CFJ 1756: Called by root (28 Sep); Judged FALSE by Taral (31 Oct) At or within one minute of Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:49:15 GMT, root initiated an inquiry case. CFJ 1755: Called by Zefram (28 Sep); Judged TRUE by Wooble (29 Sep) message <46F75B65.3070304@socal.rr.com> had the effect of resolving the Agoran decision on proposals 5224 CFJ 1754: Called by Zefram (28 Sep); Judged FALSE by Taral (29 Sep) message <46EE1408.50406@socal.rr.com> had the effect of resolving the Agoran decisions on proposals 5222 and 5223 CFJ 1753: Called by Murphy (28 Sep); Judged FALSE by root (20 Oct) Murphy left The Variety Show in the message in which this CFJ was called. CFJ 1752: Called by Murphy (28 Sep); Judged FALSE by root (20 Oct) Murphy left The Variety Show when e deregistered. CFJ 1751: Called by Murphy (24 Sep); Judged TRUE by Taral (08 Oct) Murphy caused the AFO to act in Message-ID: <46F73781.6020303@socal.rr.com> CFJ 1750: Called by Murphy (24 Sep); Judged TRUE by Taral (08 Oct) Murphy is a member of the AFO's basis. CFJ 1749: Called by pikhq (24 Sep); Judged TRUE by Zefram (03 Oct) Upon joining Agora as a first-class player, Pikhq obtained one white VC, and is of the white party. CFJ 1748: Called by root (22 Sep); Judged FALSE by Zefram (29 Sep); REMANDED on Appeal (21 Oct); Judged FALSE by Zefram (25 Oct) The ratification of an announcement of the resolution of an Agoran decision can change the decision's outcome. CFJ 1747: Called by comex (21 Sep); Judged FALSE by Murphy (24 Sep) The judicial panel of Murphy, root, and Wooble would be a person if the hypothetical Rule in the evidence section were enacted. CFJ 1746: Called by comex (21 Sep); Judged FALSE by Murphy (24 Sep) The judicial panel of Murphy, root, and Wooble is a person. CFJ 1745: Called by Murphy (18 Sep); Judged FALSE by Wooble (19 Sep); OVERRULED to IRRELEVANT on Appeal (22 Oct) It is possible for a judicial case to have more than one subclass. CFJ 1744: Called by Wooble (18 Sep); Judged UNDETERMINED by Taral (25 Sep) Big Brother is a Player. CFJ 1743: Called by Murphy (18 Sep); Judged TRUE by Zefram (24 Sep) Eris initiated an Agoran decision to determine a new holder for the office of Scorekeepor in the message with Message-id: CFJ 1742: Called by Pavitra (13 Sep); Judged TRUE by Murphy (17 Sep) It is possible for a judicial case to exist that has no subclass. CFJ 1741: Called by Peekee (11 Sep); Judged TRUE by root (18 Sep) Peekee is a player. CFJ 1740: Called by Zefram (06 Sep); Judged GUILTY by Taral (21 Sep); OVERRULED to APOLOGY on Appeal (21 Sep) BobTHJ violated rule 1504 by failing to notify the defendant in CFJ 1735 as soon as possible while assigned as judge of that case during the pre-trial period. CFJ 1739: Called by comex (29 Aug); Judged UNDETERMINED by Taral (05 Sep) A part of a message sent to a Public Forum that is quoting another message (even if the quote is intended to perform an action) is never a violation of Rule 2149 to publish. CFJ 1738: Called by Zefram (29 Aug); Judged TRUE by root (29 Aug) rule 2149's obligation on a knave to not publish statements that e believes are true is in conflict with the knave's right of participation in the fora. CFJ 1737: Called by Murphy (29 Aug); Judged TRUE by root (21 Sep) The pre-trial phase of a criminal case does not end until one week after the judge informs the defendant of the case and invites em to rebut the argument for eir guilt. CFJ 1736: Called by comex (23 Aug); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Murphy (29 Aug) The Pineapple Partnership failed to hail Eris CFJ 1735: Called by comex (23 Aug); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Zefram (21 Oct) Eris published a statement that e thinks is true CFJ 1734: Called by comex (23 Aug); Judged IRRELEVANT by Taral (24 Aug) comex sucks CFJ 1733: Called by comex (23 Aug); Judged SLIPPERY by root (04 Sep) Eris violated a rule CFJ 1732: Called by comex (23 Aug); Judged TRUE by Zefram (23 Aug) if an inquiry case with the statement "the holder of the office of Clerk of the Courts is Zefram" was judged FALSE, the holder of the office of Clerk of the Courts would be Zefram CFJ 1731: Called by Zefram (23 Aug); Judged TRUE by Murphy (29 Aug) it is possible for a person to bear more than one instance of a patent title simultaneously. CFJ 1730: Called by Pavitra (22 Aug); Judged TRUE by Zefram (30 Aug) The player Goddess Eris assigned judgements to the CFJs 1716, 1710, 1711, 1724, and 1725. CFJ 1729: Called by Zefram (21 Aug); Judged TRUE by root (28 Aug) The Host has awarded Levi a total of 100 points so far. CFJ 1728: Called by BobTHJ (20 Aug); Judged FALSE by Murphy (20 Aug) A player who is an eligible voter may submit an infinite number of votes on a proposal. CFJ 1727: Called by Murphy (17 Aug); Judged FALSE by Wooble (18 Aug) BobTHJ lost one VC for recusing emself from CFJ 1712. CFJ 1726: Called by Murphy (17 Aug); Judged FALSE by comex (17 Aug) BobTHJ lost one Blue VC for recusing emself from CFJ 1712. CFJ 1725: Called by Peekee (16 Aug); Judged UNDETERMINED by Taral (22 Aug) hedgehogcull is a Player. CFJ 1724: Called by Peekee (16 Aug); Judged UNDETERMINED by Taral (22 Aug) eekeeP is a Player. CFJ 1723: Called by root (15 Aug); Judged FALSE by Murphy (21 Aug) On or around August 15, 2007, root initiated an Agoran decision to approve the action of making bd_ inactive. CFJ 1722: Called by root (15 Aug); Judged FALSE by Zefram (20 Aug) On or around August 15, 2007, root initiated an Agoran decision to make bd_ inactive. CFJ 1721: Called by Wooble (13 Aug); Judged TRUE by Zefram (21 Aug) The Person known to Agora as Peekee recently sent a message to the Public Forum containing the text "I did not send the message." CFJ 1720: Called by Zefram (12 Aug); Judged FALSE by root (14 Aug) in CFJ 1715, the alleged act is illegal but impossible. CFJ 1719: Called by root (12 Aug); Judged FALSE by Zefram (15 Aug) Peekee is a player. CFJ 1718: Called by Peekee (08 Aug); Judged IRRELEVANT by root (13 Aug) Peekee submitted an email to the agora-discussion forum containing "Fnord!" CFJ 1717: Called by Peekee (08 Aug); Judged TRUE by Murphy (13 Aug) Murphy submitted a proposal in eir recent post with subject "What is the title of this proposal?" CFJ 1716: Called by comex (03 Aug); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Taral (22 Aug) Peekee has violated Rule 2149 by deliberately or recklessly making the false statement "maybe" CFJ 1715: Called by comex (03 Aug); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Wooble (14 Aug) Peekee has violated Rule 754 by sending communication with little regularity. CFJ 1714: Called by Wooble (03 Aug); Judged UNDECIDABLE by Zefram (03 Aug); AFFIRMED on Appeal (07 Aug) A Player of Agora who is not the Ambassador CAN unilaterally take Game Actions in a foreign nomic on Agora's behalf if it is legal for Agora to take those Actions in the foreign nomic. CFJ 1713: Called by Zefram (02 Aug); Judged TRUE by Wooble (02 Aug) CFJ 1712 is a criminal case. CFJ 1712: Called by Murphy (01 Aug); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Wooble (15 Aug) CotC Zefram violated Rule 1871 (The Standing Court) by changing all sitting players to standing on or about Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:11:48 +0100. CFJ 1711: Called by Murphy (01 Aug); Judged FALSE by Taral (22 Aug); REMANDED on Appeal (07 Oct); Judged TRUE by pikhq (21 Oct); OVERRULED to FALSE on Appeal (22 Oct) Proposal 5085 was adopted on or about Mon, 23 Jul 2007 06:25:41 -0700. CFJ 1710: Called by Murphy (01 Aug); Judged FALSE by Taral (22 Aug) Proposal 5085 was adopted on or about Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:31:06 -0700. CFJ 1709: Called by Zefram (26 Jul); Judged IRRELEVANT by comex (05 Aug) rule 1742's obligation to act in accordance with contracts is binding on non-player parties to R1742 contracts. CFJ 1708: Called by Zefram (23 Jul); Judged UNIMPUGNED by Murphy (29 Aug) comex violated rule 2149 by falsely claiming in message <6bf32280707091136l373a0b37m7e5516a9279d2335@mail.gmail.com> that eir nickname is "Murphy". CFJ 1707: Called by Zefram (20 Jul); Judged TRUE by Human Point Two (23 Jul) B Nomic met rule 2147's requirements at the time of BobTHJ's message on 2007-06-14 in which e claimed to make B Nomic a protectorate. CFJ 1706: Called by BobTHJ (20 Jul); Judged TRUE by Pineapple Partnership (23 Jul) Gunner Nomic 2.0 is not a non-natural person by the rules of Agora. CFJ 1705: Called by Murphy (18 Jul); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (24 Jul) It is possible for the Speaker to hold the office of Clerk of the Courts. CFJ 1704: Called by Zefram (17 Jul); Judged TRUE by Murphy (19 Jul) Primo Corporation is a protectorate. CFJ 1703: Called by OscarMeyr (13 Jul); Judged FALSE by root (19 Jul) Comex successfully changed eir nickname to Murphy on 9 July 2007. CFJ 1702: Called by Murphy (12 Jul); Judged TRUE by Zefram (01 Aug) A requirement to submit something to an officer is satisfied by publishing it, even if that office is vacant at the time. CFJ 1701: Called by Zefram (11 Jul); Judged FALSE by Human Point Two (21 Jul) to qualify as a member of a partnership one must be responsible for all of the partnership's obligations. CFJ 1700: Called by Zefram (10 Jul); Judged TRUE by Wooble (19 Jul) Peekee's colleague Jon is a person. CFJ 1699: Called by Zefram (09 Jul); Judged FALSE by BobTHJ (25 Jul) comex has violated rule 2149 by falsely claiming in message <6bf32280707091136l373a0b37m7e5516a9279d2335@mail.gmail.com> that eir nickname is "Murphy". CFJ 1698: Called by comex (09 Jul); Judged FALSE by Zefram (24 Jul) The player with the email address emurphy42@socal.rr.com has violated Rule 1586 by having the same nickname as me (the caller of this CFJ). CFJ 1697: Called by BobTHJ (02 Jul); Judged TRUE by Pineapple Partnership (20 Jul) Since the repeal of Gunner Nomic 2.0 rule 357.3 Gunner Nomic no longer satisfies the conditions of a Player of Agora. CFJ 1696: Called by BobTHJ (02 Jul); Judged TRUE by Pineapple Partnership (20 Jul) Since the repeal of Gunner Nomic 2.0 rule 357.3, Gunner Nomic no longer satisfies the conditions of a Partnership. CFJ 1695: Called by Levi (23 Jun); Judged TRUE by root (13 Jul) BobTHJ can vote on behalf of Primo Corporation CFJ 1694: Called by BobTHJ (22 Jun); Judged TRUE by Primo Corporation (16 Jul) Gunner Nomic 2.0 has allowed Agora unrestricted access to change its ruleset. CFJ 1693: Called by root (20 Jun); Judged TRUE by Murphy (28 Jun) CFJ 1684 has been judged. CFJ 1692: Called by root (20 Jun); Judged TRUE by Murphy (28 Jun) A CFJ that was called on or around May 25, 2007 is identified by the index 1684. CFJ 1691: Called by comex (20 Jun); Judged TRUE by Murphy (29 Jun) The Pineapple Partnership is a person. CFJ 1690: Called by Goethe (19 Jun); Judged TRUE by Zefram (28 Jun) Prior to this CFJ, the results of Proposal 4977 were not challenged. CFJ 1689: Called by comex (15 Jun); Judged FALSE by root (28 Jun) root changed his Primo Corporation share holdings to 1 million on or about Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:35:18 -0600. CFJ 1688: Called by Murphy (15 Jun); Judged TRUE by root (06 Aug) Murphy is the author of Proposal 4939. CFJ 1687: Called by Zefram (08 Jun); Judged FALSE by Human Point Two (29 Jun); SUSTAINED on Appeal (19 Jul) a binding agreement created under the laws of the state of Colorado can form a partnership that constitutes a person in Agoran law CFJ 1686: Called by BobTHJ (07 Jun); Judged FALSE by Murphy (13 Jun) root has violated the agreement titled "Primo Corporation Charter" CFJ 1685: Called by Goethe (31 May); Judged FALSE by Zefram (08 Jun) root's keyboard is a player. CFJ 1684: Called by root (26 May); Judged FALSE by Taral (19 Jun); OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal (02 Aug) The Pineapple Partnership is a person. CFJ 1683: Called by Zefram (23 May); Judged FALSE by Human Point Two (26 May) a binding agreement under rule 1742 can be made among a set of exactly zero players (the empty set) CFJ 1682: Called by Zefram (23 May); Judged FALSE by Human Point Two (26 May) a binding agreement under rule 1742 can be made among a set of exactly one player CFJ 1681: Called by comex (22 May); Judged FALSE by Human Point Two (26 May) Within three minutes before Mon, 21 May 2007 20:19:27 -0500, Yin Corp was a person distinct from Quazie CFJ 1680: Called by comex (22 May); Judged FALSE by Human Point Two (26 May) Yin Corp and Yang Corp are the same person CFJ 1679: Called by comex (22 May); Judged FALSE by Human Point Two (26 May) Yang Corp is a person CFJ 1678: Called by comex (22 May); Judged FALSE by Human Point Two (26 May) Yin Corp is a person CFJ 1677: Called by comex (22 May); Judged FALSE by Pineapple Partnership (29 Jun) this is not a CFJ CFJ 1676: Called by comex (22 May); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (07 Jun) this is a CFJ CFJ 1675: Called by Murphy (20 May); Judged FALSE by The Hanging Judge (23 May) Quorum for a proposal is based on the maximum number of eligible voters at any time during the voting period. CFJ 1674: Called by Murphy (20 May); Judged FALSE by The Hanging Judge (23 May) Quorum for a proposal is based on the number of eligible voters at the end of the voting period. CFJ 1673: Called by Murphy (20 May); Judged FALSE by The Hanging Judge (23 May) Quorum for a proposal is based on the number of eligible voters at the start of the voting period. CFJ 1672: Called by Quazie (18 May); Judged TRUE by The Hanging Judge (07 Jun) The International Associate Director of Personnel is the Director of Personnel. CFJ 1671: Called by comex (17 May); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (07 Jun) Second-System Effect registered on or about Sun, 13 May 2007 16:09:28 -0700 CFJ 1670: Called by Zefram (16 May); Judged TRUE by Murphy (08 Jun) where a proposal's distribution has a different text from the proposal's submission, and the proposal is adopted, the version of the proposal that takes effect is the distributed version CFJ 1669: Called by Zefram (16 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (08 Jun) where a purported distribution of a proposal has a text that is slightly and non-obviously different from the text of the proposal as submitted, and otherwise conforms to the rules' requirements on proposal distribution, this constitutes a distribution of the submitted proposal CFJ 1668: Called by Zefram (14 May); Judged FALSE by The Hanging Judge (23 May) if a partnership agreement allows for the set of partners to change, and such a change occurs from one set of natural persons to a different set of natural persons, then the partnership defined before the change is a different legal person from the partnership defined after the change. CFJ 1667: Called by Zefram (14 May); Judged FALSE by The Hanging Judge (23 May) if there is a partnership agreement A, defining a partnership PA, for which the partners are a partnership PB and one of PB's members M, then PA is the same legal person as PB. CFJ 1666: Called by Zefram (14 May); Judged FALSE by The Hanging Judge (23 May) if two binding agreements each purport to construct a partnership, and the set of partners is the same for both, then the two agreements construct and govern a single partnership. CFJ 1665: Called by Murphy (14 May); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (28 Jun) Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , one or more of (BobTHJ, Eris, Levi, Maud, Peter, Sherlock) were Partners as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. CFJ 1664: Called by Murphy (14 May); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (28 Jun) Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , one or more of (comex, Eris, Manu, Maud, Quazie, Sherlock) were Partners as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. CFJ 1663: Called by Murphy (14 May); Judged FALSE by BobTHJ (28 Jun) Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , one or more of (GreyKnight, Levi, Manu, Maud, sproingie) were Partners as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. CFJ 1662: Called by Murphy (14 May); Judged FALSE by BobTHJ (28 Jun) Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , one or more of (OscarMeyr, Peter, Quazie, Sherlock, sproingie) were Partners as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. CFJ 1661: Called by Murphy (14 May); Judged TRUE by BobTHJ (28 Jun) Immediately after Goethe's message with Message-ID , there were exactly two Partners, including Zefram, as described by the Pineapple Partnership agreement. CFJ 1660: Called by Murphy (13 May); Judged TRUE by root (13 Jun) The words "Office" and "Officer" used by the charter of Primo Corporation, when qualified by the additional phrase "of Primo Corporation", are not bound by the Rule definition of the words "Office" and "Officer". CFJ 1659: Called by Murphy (13 May); Judged FALSE by root (13 Jun) The phrase "by announcement" and similar phrases used by the charter of Primo Corporation, when qualified by the additional phrase "to the Corporate Forum", are not bound by the standard Rule definition of the phrase "by announcement". CFJ 1658: Called by comex (11 May); Judged TRUE by Zefram (28 Jun) The term 'contract' as used in R2136 should be interpreted as synonymous with 'binding agreement'. CFJ 1657: Called by comex (11 May); Judged FALSE by Zefram (28 Jun) The term 'contract' as used in R2136 should be interpreted as synonymous with 'Agoran Contract'. CFJ 1656: Called by Zefram (09 May); Judged TRUE by root (13 Jun) the Promotor has distributed a proposal under the description "proposal 4963" which includes the text "Change the Power of rule 2126 to 2." CFJ 1655: Called by Zefram (09 May); Judged FALSE by root (13 Jun) the Promotor has distributed the proposal titled "mostly-random judicial assignments" submitted by Zefram CFJ 1654: Called by Zefram (06 May); Judged TRUE by comex (14 May) item (a) in rule 683 requires that for a ballot to be valid its submitter must be an eligible voter at the time that that the ballot's validity is determined CFJ 1653: Called by Zefram (06 May); Judged FALSE by comex (14 May) item (a) in rule 683 requires that for a ballot to be valid its submitter must be an eligible voter at the time that the ballot is submitted CFJ 1652: Called by Zefram (06 May); Judged TRUE by comex (14 May) the set of eligible voters on an Agoran decision can change during its voting period CFJ 1651: Called by Zefram (06 May); Judged TRUE by Quazie (18 May); OVERTURNED on Appeal (12 Jul); Judged TRUE by Murphy (07 Aug) if a R107 notice initiating an Agoran decision does not contain an explicit list of the eligible voters, and there is later a dispute (evidenced by submission of a CFJ) over which voters were eligible at that time, then the notice's description of the class of eligible voters was necessarily insufficient to enable public agreement on which persons are eligible CFJ 1650: Called by Zefram (06 May); Judged TRUE by Murphy (11 May) a message labelled as a "distribution of proposals" and detailing the text and other attributes of proposals, as has been periodically published during the first quarter of 2007, in the absence of public disagreement over voter eligibility, qualifies as a set of R107 notices initiating the Agoran decisions on the adoption of those proposals CFJ 1649: Called by BobTHJ (04 May); Judged TRUE by Zefram (13 Jun) BobTHJ is an eligible voter on proposals 4947-4957 CFJ 1648: Called by Murphy (01 May); Judged TRUE by Maud (14 May) BobTHJ registered on or about Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:06:41 -0600. CFJ 1647: Called by Taral (30 Apr); Judged FALSE by Murphy (29 Jun) Murphy's message with datestamp Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:59:19 -0700 had the effect of submitting a proposal. CFJ 1646: Called by Zefram (30 Apr); Judged TRUE by Taral (18 May) Quazie's VC spending in the message identified by message ID <4635317D.8030401@gmail.com> took effect in the Agoran week beginning at 00:00 UTC on 30 April 2007. CFJ 1645: Called by Zefram (29 Apr); Dismissed by Goethe (29 Apr) where a proposal attempts two separate rule changes affecting the same rule, if one of the attempted rule changes is not possible and the other is then the possible rule change does in fact occur, even if both attempted rule changes were specified in a single sentence, unless the proposal explicitly requires a different resolution CFJ 1644: Called by Zefram (29 Apr); Judged TRUE by Goethe (29 Apr) where a proposal contains the form of words "Change the power of rule NNNN to P and amend it by XXX.", where XXX specifies a text change, this constitutes two attempted rule changes CFJ 1643: Called by Zefram (29 Apr); Judged FALSE by Goethe (29 Apr) where a proposal specifies a single rule amendment in two parts, and one of the parts is not possible, the whole attempted amendment fails, even if the other part could have been applied if it stood alone CFJ 1642: Called by Zefram (29 Apr); Judged FALSE by Goethe (29 Apr) where a proposal contains the form of words "Amend rule NNNN by XXX. Further amend rule NNNN by YYY.", where both XXX and YYY specify text changes, this constitutes a single attempt at a rule change, even though it is specified in two parts in separate sentences CFJ 1641: Called by Zefram (29 Apr); Judged TRUE by Goethe (29 Apr) where a proposal contains the form of words "Amend rule NNNN by XXX and by YYY.", where both XXX and YYY specify text changes, this constitutes a single attempt at a rule change, even though it is specified in two parts CFJ 1640: Called by Zefram (29 Apr); Judged TRUE by Goethe (29 Apr) where a proposal contains the form of words "Amend rule NNNN by XXX and YYY.", where both XXX and YYY specify text changes, this constitutes a single attempt at a rule change, even though it is specified in two parts CFJ 1639: Called by Zefram (29 Apr); Judged TRUE by Goethe (29 Apr) where a proposal attempts two separate amendments of the text of the same rule, if one of the attempted amendments is not possible and the other is then the possible amendment does in fact occur, unless the proposal explicitly requires a different resolution CFJ 1638: Called by Zefram (29 Apr); Judged TRUE by Goethe (29 Apr) where a proposal contains the form of words "Amend rule NNNN by XXX. Amend rule NNNN by YYY.", this constitutes two separate attempts at rule changes, even though both attempt to amend the same rule CFJ 1637: Called by Goethe (29 Apr); Dismissed by Zefram (29 Apr) If no punishment is proscribed for a given action, that action is not illegal. CFJ 1636: Called by Goethe (29 Apr); Judged FALSE by Zefram (29 Apr) If an action can not be punished, than no punishment is proscribed. CFJ 1635: Called by Goethe (29 Apr); Judged TRUE by Zefram (29 Apr) If an action is not performed, it can not be punished. CFJ 1634: Called by Goethe (29 Apr); Judged FALSE by Zefram (29 Apr) If an action is ineffective, it is not performed. CFJ 1633: Called by Goethe (29 Apr); Dismissed by Zefram (29 Apr) If an action is illegal, it is considered ineffective. CFJ 1632: Called by Goethe (29 Apr); Judged FALSE by Zefram (29 Apr) If the rules proscribe a punishment for a given action, that action is illegal. CFJ 1631: Called by Murphy (29 Apr); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (06 May) comex registered on or about Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:00:01 -0400. CFJ 1630: Called by Goethe (29 Apr); Dismissed by Levi (29 Apr) We're all mad, here. CFJ 1629: Called by Goethe (29 Apr); Dismissed by Pineapple Partnership (11 May) There are elephants to the left. CFJ 1628: Called by Goethe (29 Apr); Dismissed by Zefram (29 Apr) Zefram is wearing a hat. CFJ 1627: Called by Zefram (29 Apr); Judged FALSE by Maud (05 May) the text in exhibit A, if enacted into a Rule, would conflict with Rule 101 CFJ 1626: Called by Murphy (08 Apr); Judged TRUE by Zefram (11 Apr) A rule cannot directly enact, modify, or repeal a rule (including itself), unless it takes precedence over the last paragraph of Rule 105. CFJ 1625: Called by Zefram (01 Apr); Judged FALSE by Pineapple Partnership (29 Apr) proposal 4805 succeeded in amending rule 2101 (prior to repealing it) CFJ 1624: Called by Zefram (01 Apr); Judged TRUE by Levi (11 Apr) neither rule 2009 nor rule 2037 has been repealed CFJ 1623: Called by Murphy (27 Feb); Judged TRUE by Pineapple Partnership (27 Mar) The Pineapple Partnership is a person. CFJ 1622: Called by Pineapple Partnership (26 Feb); Judged TRUE by Goethe (13 Mar) the Pineapple Partnership is a person CFJ 1621: Called by Murphy (08 Feb); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (12 Apr); REMANDED on Appeal (26 Jun); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (23 Jul) GreyKnight is a player. CFJ 1620: Called by Quazie (06 Feb); Judged FALSE by Zefram (22 Feb) The following statement from the judgment of CFJ 1589 is true 'All players that were inactive when 4866 was adopted are considered inactive for any such rule until they next participate in Agora, from which point they should be considered active.' CFJ 1619: Called by Quazie (06 Feb); Judged FALSE by Zefram (22 Feb) Any actions Quazie has preformed since september 18th 2006 that are limited to active players never happened CFJ 1618: Called by Quazie (06 Feb); Judged FALSE by Zefram (22 Feb) Quazie is inactive CFJ 1617: Called by Murphy (06 Feb); Judged TRUE by Goethe (11 Apr) Rule 2024 should be interpreted such that "same Agoran Week" means "same Agoran Week as the possibly-Excess CFJ". CFJ 1616: Called by Goethe (02 Feb); Judged TRUE by Sherlock (28 Feb) Zefram is a person. CFJ 1615: Called by Goethe (02 Feb); Judged TRUE by Sherlock (28 Feb) Zefram successfully called for judgement on or about Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:06:14 +0000. CFJ 1614: Called by Zefram (02 Feb); Dismissed by OscarMeyr (25 Feb) Zefram is an avocado. CFJ 1613: Called by Goethe (02 Feb); Dismissed by Peter (27 Feb) Zefram is a pineapple. CFJ 1612: Called by Zefram (31 Jan); Dismissed by GreyKnight (31 Jan); Judged TRUE by Murphy (11 Apr) Rule 1871 should be interpreted such that it is possible to publish a Notice of Rotation, and that such a Notice has the effect of making all turned players unturned, even if there is no open CFJ with no Trial Judge assigned to it CFJ 1611: Called by Zefram (31 Jan); Dismissed by GreyKnight (31 Jan); Judged TRUE by comex (26 Jun) GreyKnight has violated Rule 1868 by failing to assign a Trial Judge to CFJs 1600 to 1604 CFJ 1610: Called by Zefram (31 Jan); Dismissed by GreyKnight (31 Jan); Judged FALSE by Goethe (06 Apr) this is an Excess CFJ CFJ 1609: Called by Maud (13 Jan); Judged FALSE by Cecilius (28 Feb) Michael's message, on or about 11 January 2007, reading in part "I hereby vote AGAINST all proposals currently up for vote", did not have the effect of submitting any ballots. CFJ 1608: Called by Goethe (12 Jan); Judged TRUE by Maud (29 Mar) Unanimous (Voting index = Unanimity) Proposals may be adopted. CFJ 1607: Called by Goethe (12 Jan); Judged FALSE by Cecilius (02 Feb) Non-Unanimous (Voting index not Unanimity) Agoran Decisions may not be adopted. CFJ 1606: Called by Goethe (11 Jan); Dismissed by Murphy (30 Mar) Goethe was deregistered in a Writ of FAGE in December 2006. CFJ 1605: Called by Zefram (11 Jan); Judged FALSE by Murphy (06 Feb) Rule 955 should be interpreted such a voting index of "Unanimity" cannot meet or exceed any numerical adoption index. CFJ 1604: Called by Zefram (10 Jan); Judged FALSE by Murphy (26 Feb) it is impossible to assign to Judge this CFJ any player who was registered at the time it was called. CFJ 1603: Called by Zefram (10 Jan); Judged TRUE by Murphy (26 Feb) being Barred from judging a CFJ does not constitute being Barred from judging a set of Linked CFJs containing that CFJ, even though it has the effect of making the Barred person ineligible to Judge such a set of Linked CFJs under some circumstances. CFJ 1602: Called by Zefram (10 Jan); Judged TRUE by Murphy (26 Feb) a set of Linked CFJs is an entity distinct from the individual CFJs from which it is composed. CFJ 1601: Called by Zefram (10 Jan); Judged FALSE by Murphy (26 Feb) when a Judge is to be assigned to a set of Linked CFJs as required by Rule 2024, references in Rule 698 to "that CFJ" or "that increasingly annoying CFJ" must be interpreted as references to the set of Linked CFJs. CFJ 1600: Called by Zefram (10 Jan); Judged TRUE by Murphy (26 Feb) in Rule 698 the phrase "all barred players" means all Players that are Barred from Judging the increasingly annoying CFJ. CFJ 1599: Called by Murphy (04 Jan); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (02 Feb) Rule 402 (Church and State) may cause the Clerk of the Courts to become Speaker. CFJ 1598: Called by Sherlock (30 Dec); Judged FALSE by GreyKnight (31 Jan) Murphy received more than one Patent Title of Champion on December 30th, 2006 CFJ 1597: Called by Goethe (22 Dec); Judged FALSE by Michael (31 Jan) An appeal of the Trial Judgement for CFJ 1594 may not be initiated. CFJ 1596: Called by Quazie (21 Dec); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (29 Mar) CFJ 1594 has been judged. CFJ 1595: Called by Murphy (18 Dec); Dismissed by Quazie (24 Jan) Agora is dead. CFJ 1594: Called by Murphy (16 Dec); Judged TRUE by Sherlock (21 Dec); REVERSED on Appeal (30 Mar) Players cannot be deregistered due to Rule 1789. CFJ 1593: Called by Goethe (01 Dec); Judged FALSE by Murphy (30 Mar) Evantine is a Fugitive from Justice. CFJ 1592: Called by Goethe (01 Dec); Judged TRUE by Murphy (30 Mar) Evantine holds the patent title Fugitive. CFJ 1591: Called by Goethe (01 Dec); Judged TRUE by Murphy (30 Mar) Evantine is a Fugitive. CFJ 1590: Called by Murphy (18 Sep); Judged FALSE by GreyKnight (09 Nov) Quazie is eligible to be a Judge. CFJ 1589: Called by Murphy (18 Sep); Judged FALSE by GreyKnight (09 Nov); REVERSED on Appeal (02 Feb) Quazie is inactive. CFJ 1588: Called by Goethe (07 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (24 Jul) An Appeal may not be initiated twice for the same trial judgement. CFJ 1587: Called by Goethe (05 Apr); Dismissed by Taral (02 Aug) If, as part of eir duties with respect to the Speaker's Veto, the Assessor publishes a copy of a vetoed proposal with clear indication that it become a proposal, then the Assessor is the Proposer of that new Proposal. CFJ 1586: Called by Goethe (05 Apr); Judged TRUE by Taral (02 Aug) The text in the most recent Proposal Pool Report, purporting to be Proposal 06-017 ("Fixing Your Turn"), is a Proposal. CFJ 1585: Called by Goethe (21 Mar); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (18 Jun) The Deckmastor may legally deal a card to Goethe, thus satisfying a pending draw, but e may not legally deal a card to Quazie. CFJ 1584: Called by Goethe (24 Feb); Judged FALSE by Michael (20 Mar) Sherlock has made an infinite number of notes that The Library held a winning hand. CFJ 1583: Called by Sherlock (24 Feb); Judged FALSE by Taral (06 Mar) Sherlock played Corporate Bankruptcy on February 10th, 2006. CFJ 1582: Called by Goethe (21 Feb); Judged FALSE by Manu (01 Mar) Conclaves have a quorum of 5. CFJ 1581: Called by root (20 Feb); Judged FALSE by Goethe (01 Mar) Proposal 06-006, titled "Quick Conclave Fix" and submitted by root on February 20, 2006, is democratic. CFJ 1580: Called by Goethe (12 Jan); Judged FALSE by Murphy (13 Feb) Maud performed a regulated action in this message: http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2006-January/005510.html CFJ 1579: Called by Taral (21 Dec); Judged FALSE by Michael (16 Jan) Eris gained an albatross of the Thief from eir play of Thieves in the Night naming Riail. CFJ 1578: Called by Taral (21 Dec); Judged FALSE by Michael (16 Jan) Eris's play of Thieves in the Night naming Riail was successful. CFJ 1577: Called by Sherlock (17 Dec); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (13 Feb) The Registrar has not legally resolved the Rebellion that occurred on December 15th, 2005. CFJ 1576: Called by Goethe (31 Oct); Judged TRUE by Maud (17 Nov) Goethe successfully played Corporate Bankruptcy on or about Oct. 31, 2005. CFJ 1575: Called by Goethe (26 Aug); Judged TRUE by Taral (26 Sep) root is required to deliver a legal judgement for CFJ 1278. CFJ 1574: Called by Manu (28 Jul); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (14 Aug) All Cards curently defined in the Onepower Cardbook that change Kudos (other than fees) are invalid and have no effect. CFJ 1573: Called by Maud (04 Jul); Judged FALSE by Goethe (11 Jul) OscarMeyr became Speaker on or about 22:58:35 on 30 June 2005. CFJ 1572: Called by Maud (06 Jun); Judged TRUE by Murphy (26 Jun) The phrase "no Votes were cast AGAINST it" in rule 2095 should be interpreted as "any vote cast AGAINST it either was cancelled or at the end of the voting period had a vote value besides AGAINST". CFJ 1571: Called by root (04 Jun); Judged TRUE by Sherlock (17 Jun) The orders executed by Goethe in the second message submitted as evidence are improper. CFJ 1570: Called by root (04 Jun); Judged TRUE by Sherlock (17 Jun) The legality of at least one of the transfers referenced by Goethe in the first message submitted as evidence cannot be determined with finality, as required by the rule "Win by Paradox". CFJ 1569: Called by Manu (25 May); Judged FALSE by Maud (08 Jun) Manu successfully transfered a Kudo from a Contract to emself at least once. CFJ 1568: Called by OscarMeyr (22 May); Judged TRUE by Michael (25 May) root is Noisy. CFJ 1567: Called by Goethe (20 May); Judged TRUE by Manu (27 May) If Sherlock has a One Share card, then Goethe errored in good faith in determining the cards to deal, and the errors did not greatly change the probability of the cards that were selected. CFJ 1566: Called by Quazie (13 May); Judged FALSE by root (22 May) Eris is guilty of Delay of Game after Quazie played Your Turn indicating Eris. CFJ 1565: Called by Maud (12 May); Judged FALSE by Goethe (13 Jun) The holder of power of attorney for a player who is not the speaker may deregister that player. CFJ 1564: Called by Sherlock (05 May); Dismissed by Murphy (15 May) Goethe possesses a Not Your Turn card. CFJ 1563: Called by Sherlock (05 May); Dismissed by OscarMeyr (14 May) Goethe possesses a Discard Picking card. CFJ 1562: Called by Goethe (03 May); Judged TRUE by Michael (05 May) A cancelled vote on a Proposal does not count towards quorum. CFJ 1561: Called by Manu (29 Apr); Judged TRUE by Goethe (05 May) The Library can not receive Boons and/or Patent Titles CFJ 1560: Called by Sherlock (27 Apr); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (05 May) The Justiciar's report was not ratified in 2003. CFJ 1559: Called by Quazie (23 Apr); Judged FALSE by Manu (27 Apr) Quazie successfully played Library Renewal on April 21st CFJ 1558: Called by Quazie (18 Apr); Judged TRUE by Maud (24 Apr) When gazebo_dude deregistered, Thieves in the Night was returned to the deck CFJ 1557: Called by Goethe (18 Apr); Judged FALSE by Manu (20 Apr) Quazie's private Orders to Goethe on or about Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:41:06 were improperly executed. CFJ 1556: Called by Goethe (18 Apr); Judged FALSE by Manu (20 Apr) Goethe's private Orders to Quazie on or about Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:27:50 were improperly executed. CFJ 1555: Called by Goethe (18 Apr); Judged TRUE by Manu (19 Apr) Quazie's private Orders to Goethe on or about Sat, 9 Apr 2005 04:28:32 were improperly executed. CFJ 1554: Called by Quazie (18 Apr); Judged TRUE by root (25 Apr) At least one proposal containing a rule change, that was submitted after Rule 1561 was created, has taken effect. CFJ 1553: Called by root (18 Apr); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (21 Apr) The Assessor may refuse to assign a voting index to an aborted proposal. CFJ 1552: Called by root (18 Apr); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (21 Apr) The Assessor may refuse to publish the votes cast on an aborted proposal. CFJ 1551: Called by root (18 Apr); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (21 Apr) An aborted proposal necessarily fails. CFJ 1550: Called by root (18 Apr); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (21 Apr); SUSTAINED on Appeal (03 Jun); REVERSED on Appeal (19 Jun) When a proposal is aborted, all votes cast on it are canceled. CFJ 1549: Called by root (18 Apr); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (21 Apr) When a proposal is aborted, its voting period immediately ends, if it has not ended already. CFJ 1548: Called by Quazie (17 Apr); Judged TRUE by root (05 May) root successfully played 'drop your weapon' on saturday april 16th CFJ 1547: Called by Murphy (15 Apr); Judged TRUE by Michael (20 Apr) Multiple CFJs are not linked unless they are clearly labelled as Linked CFJs within the message in which they are submitted. CFJ 1546: Called by root (14 Apr); Judged TRUE by Kolja (20 Apr) In reports and distributions, the Promotor is permitted to add or delete whitespace or other formatting text to or from a proposal, provided that the substance of the proposal is not altered. CFJ 1545: Called by Quazie (14 Apr); Dismissed by Murphy (26 Apr) Goethe's order to Quazie, ordering Quazie to withdraw eir orders because they were invalid, was a valid order CFJ 1544: Called by Quazie (14 Apr); Judged TRUE by Kolja (21 Apr) Quazie's order to Goethe, ordering Goethe to publicly announce that e is a Ninny, was a valid order CFJ 1543: Called by Quazie (14 Apr); Judged TRUE by Maud (24 Apr) Quazie's order to Goethe, ordering Goethe to dance, was a valid order CFJ 1542: Called by Kolja (12 Apr); Judged FALSE by Sherlock (19 Apr) The rules currently define no card with the caption "Your Turn". CFJ 1541: Called by Murphy (12 Apr); Judged FALSE by Goethe (18 Apr) On or about Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:46:45 -0400, root submitted a Call for Judgement with the statement "Quazie attempted to declare Presence on several Ordinary proposals". CFJ 1540: Called by Murphy (12 Apr); Judged FALSE by Goethe (18 Apr) On or about Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:46:45 -0400, root submitted a Call for Judgement with the statement "e attempted to declare Presence on several Ordinary proposals". CFJ 1539: Called by Murphy (12 Apr); Judged FALSE by Goethe (18 Apr) On or about Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:46:45 -0400, root submitted a Call for Judgement. CFJ 1538: Called by Goethe (07 Apr); Judged TRUE by Riail (17 Apr) A successful play of the Corporate Bankruptcy card causes any shares cards not in the Deck to be discarded. CFJ 1537: Called by root (07 Apr); Judged TRUE by Quazie (11 Apr) Goethe has a Two Shares card. CFJ 1536: Called by Murphy (13 Mar); Judged FALSE by Michael (17 Mar) Murphy is not a Contestant in Pakaran's Contest. CFJ 1535: Called by Sherlock (10 Mar); Judged FALSE by root (18 Mar) Sherlock did not gain 15 Blots on June 15th, 2004. CFJ 1534: Called by Quazie (08 Mar); Judged FALSE by Kolja (24 Mar) Michael Norrish is the Speaker. CFJ 1533: Called by Goethe (07 Mar); Judged FALSE by Murphy (27 Mar); REMANDED on Appeal (06 Apr); Judged TRUE by Murphy (15 Apr); REMANDED on Appeal (17 Apr); Judged FALSE by Murphy (18 Apr) Rule 1561 cannot prevent an adopted Rule Change from taking effect. CFJ 1532: Called by Quazie (04 Mar); Judged FALSE by Sherlock (11 Mar) Proposals containing rule changes that were submitted after Rule 1561 was created have taken effect. CFJ 1531: Called by root (27 Feb); Judged FALSE by Maud (12 Mar) Proposal 4639 was Aborted. CFJ 1530: Called by Goethe (16 Feb); Judged TRUE by Manu (22 Feb) Quazie's Hand is Free. CFJ 1529: Called by Goethe (14 Feb); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (26 Feb) Goethe was a Corporate Raider when Proposal 4639's voting period ended. CFJ 1528: Called by Goethe (14 Feb); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (26 Feb) Proposal 4639 was a Takeover Proposal when its voting period ended. CFJ 1527: Called by root (14 Dec); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (23 Jan) Goethe has nine Pennies. CFJ 1526: Called by Murphy (20 Nov); Judged TRUE by Riail (13 Dec) No player's Voting Potential has increased due to Proposal 4618 (Battery packs). CFJ 1525: Called by OscarMeyr (15 Nov); Judged FALSE by RedKnight (27 Nov) The Patent Title of Champion defined in R2075 is different from the previous Patent Title of Champion. CFJ 1524: Called by Goethe (04 Nov); Judged FALSE by Maud (12 Nov) A Corporate Bankruptcy card has been legally dealt to root. CFJ 1523: Called by Goethe (26 Oct); Judged TRUE by root (10 Nov) If It's A Surprise is played when the hand size is above the maximum, the play wholly fails. CFJ 1522: Called by Goethe (26 Oct); Judged TRUE by root (10 Nov) A Player may NOT draw two cards without fee by playing It's A Surprise, if eir hand size is above the maximum. CFJ 1521: Called by Murphy (15 Aug); Judged TRUE by Taral (19 Aug) Eris has a beard. CFJ 1520: Called by root (29 Jul); Judged FALSE by Goethe (20 Aug) Reasonable Doubt achieved a Team Win on Thursday, July 29, 2004. CFJ 1519: Called by root (29 Jul); Judged TRUE by Goethe (20 Aug) There is a Contest named Claustronomic, and its Contestmaster is root. CFJ 1518: Called by Goethe (29 Jul); Judged FALSE by Michael (08 Oct) Elysion was awarded 5 points on or about 29-Jul-04. CFJ 1517: Called by Goethe (29 Jul); Judged TRUE by Michael (08 Oct) Claustronomic is not currently an Agoran Contest. CFJ 1516: Called by Goethe (06 Jul); Judged FALSE by Elysion (23 Jul) Murphy's honor, immediately before e attempted to increase eir Voting Potential by 41, can not be determined by reasonable effort. CFJ 1515: Called by Murphy (04 Jul); Judged FALSE by Elysion (23 Jul) Murphy's Voting Potential is 1. CFJ 1514: Called by Murphy (04 Jul); Judged FALSE by Elysion (23 Jul) Murphy's Voting Potential is 42. CFJ 1513: Called by Goethe (25 Jun); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (01 Aug) Riall holds a Debate-o-matic card. CFJ 1512: Called by Goethe (25 Jun); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (01 Aug) Proposal 4588 is in its voting period. CFJ 1511: Called by Goethe (25 Jun); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (01 Aug) Proposal 4588 is Democratic. CFJ 1510: Called by root (21 Jun); Judged TRUE by Taral (04 Jul) Riail currently possesses one or more Debate-O-Matic cards. CFJ 1509: Called by root (18 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (20 Jun) Goethe is the Prime Executor of the Deck with respect to the the requirement to post "Hot Potato" to a public forum as a result of root's play of the Hot Potato card on Sunday, May 16 2004. CFJ 1508: Called by root (18 May); Judged TRUE by Murphy (20 Jun) The Deck is guilty of the class 1 Infraction of Dropping the Potato. CFJ 1507: Called by root (18 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (20 Jun) Goethe's delegation of the Deckmastor Office to Wes on Tuesday, May 18 2004 extended the deadline of the Deck's requirement to post the phrase "Hot Potato" to "as soon as possible" after the delegation. CFJ 1506: Called by root (18 May); Judged TRUE by Murphy (20 Jun) The Deckmastor is not empowered to post messages on behalf of the Deck. CFJ 1505: Called by root (18 May); Judged TRUE by Murphy (20 Jun) root successfully played the Hot Potato card on Sunday, May 16 2004. CFJ 1504: Called by Murphy (16 May); Dismissed by Maud (28 May) At least one of (Cainech, Oerjan, Pakaran, Steve, t) is a Politician. CFJ 1503: Called by Murphy (16 May); Dismissed by Maud (28 May) At least one of (Kolja, Maud, Sherlock, Sir Toby, Wes) is a Politician. CFJ 1502: Called by Murphy (16 May); Judged FALSE by Maud (28 May) All Players are Politicians. CFJ 1501: Called by Murphy (16 May); Dismissed by Maud (28 May) All Players who are Electee to one or more Offices are Politicians. CFJ 1500: Called by Goethe (03 May); Judged TRUE by Michael (13 May) Goethe is a Politician. CFJ 1499: Called by Goethe (20 Apr); Judged FALSE by Kolja (04 Jun); SUSTAINED on Appeal (04 Jul) Rule 2050 has been repealed. CFJ 1498: Called by Wes (12 Apr); Judged FALSE by Sir Toby (21 Apr); SUSTAINED on Appeal (30 Apr) No two Rules may legally have the same Title. CFJ 1497: Called by Maud (08 Apr); Judged TRUE by Murphy (08 Apr); REMANDED on Appeal (05 May); Judged FALSE by Murphy (16 May) If a person who is a player of both Agora and Claustronomic ceases to be a player of Agora, then e also ceases to be a player of Claustronomic. CFJ 1496: Called by Elysion (04 Apr); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (11 Apr) CFJ 1495 constitutes a challenge under rule 1941 to Eris's attempt to increase eir Lobbying Strength in eir message dated Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:23:35 -0600. CFJ 1495: Called by Taral (02 Apr); Judged TRUE by Elysion (04 Apr) Eris successfully increased eir Lobbying Strength by 3 in eir message dated Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:23:35 -0600. CFJ 1494: Called by Taral (01 Apr); Judged TRUE by root (02 Apr) Eris is Immaculate. CFJ 1493: Called by Kolja (23 Mar); Judged TRUE by RedKnight (06 Apr) The position of Speaker defined in the regulations of the Contest 'Claustronomic' is currently filled by Goethe. CFJ 1492: Called by root (17 Feb); Judged FALSE by Michael (29 Feb); REMANDED on Appeal (14 Mar); Judged TRUE by Michael (19 Mar) Cainech, not root, is the Trial Judge of CFJ 1490. CFJ 1491: Called by Cainech (15 Feb); Judged FALSE by Goethe (19 Mar) CFJ's 1482 to 1487 are not valid CFJ's, as the text was never submitted to the CotC. CFJ 1490: Called by OscarMeyr (11 Feb); Judged FALSE by Cainech (17 Feb) Cainech's statement of 11 Feb 2004 14:10:04, reading "I lay a COE on OscarMeyer for accepting a COE that was not made in a public forum, thereby contravening R1431. ("A Claim of Error is a public message.....")" is NOT a valid COE. CFJ 1489: Called by Cainech (11 Feb); Judged TRUE by Maud (28 Mar) Watchers are not a rule-defined elemeent of the game. CFJ 1488: Called by Cainech (11 Feb); Judged FALSE by Sherlock (20 Feb) Bringing about a situation other than one explicitily allowed in the rules in which other Players are unable to follow rule n is, in and of itself, breaking rule n. CFJ 1487: Called by Cainech (10 Feb); Dismissed by OscarMeyr (20 Feb) A Watcher is still an active Player. CFJ 1486: Called by Cainech (10 Feb); Dismissed by OscarMeyr (20 Feb) All references in public forum to "Kolja" should refer to the original bearer of that name, Kolja A. This should be applicable retroactively. CFJ 1485: Called by Cainech (10 Feb); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (20 Feb) "Kolja" is not entitled to the benefits assosciated with being a completely new player, as the player has been registered under a different name in the past 365 days. CFJ 1484: Called by Cainech (10 Feb); Judged TRUE by OscarMeyr (20 Feb) OscarMeyer issued an invalid order by requesting that "Klaus" be globally changed to "Kolja". CFJ 1483: Called by Cainech (10 Feb); Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr (20 Feb) when referring to Kolja in public forum, it is ambiguous as to whether Klaus or Kolja A is referred to, thereby entailing an infraction of R754. CFJ 1482: Called by Cainech (10 Feb); Dismissed by Goethe (19 Feb) Kolja and Kolja A are not eligible for any responsibilities as described under R1755 until the following linked CFJ is resoloved. CFJ 1481: Called by Goethe (30 Jan); Judged TRUE by root (28 Mar) A Player's score is deemed to change at the time a Scorekeepor is notified of a scoring event, not at the time of the scoring event itself. CFJ 1480: Called by Goethe (05 Jan); Judged FALSE by Murphy (06 Jan) A Speaker Transition did *not* commence on January 1. CFJ 1479: Called by Murphy (17 Oct); Judged TRUE by Taral (17 Oct) A is not B. CFJ 1478: Called by Murphy (17 Oct); Dismissed by root (17 Oct) A is A. CFJ 1477: Called by Murphy (15 Oct); Judged FALSE by Pakaran (26 Oct) Team Dovesdar has achieved a Team Win within the past 24 hours. CFJ 1476: Called by Murphy (15 Oct); Judged TRUE by Goethe (15 Oct) Oerjan is silent. CFJ 1475: Called by Goethe (15 Oct); Judged TRUE by Murphy (15 Oct) The above message contains a valid Notice of Award. CFJ 1474: Called by root (07 Oct); Judged TRUE by RedKnight (17 Oct); REMANDED on Appeal (07 Nov); Judged FALSE by RedKnight (15 Nov) A Points Contest named Eris' Contest has awarded a positive number of points to some player during the month of October. CFJ 1473: Called by root (07 Oct); Judged FALSE by RedKnight (17 Oct) There was a Points Contest named Eris' Contest at the beginning of the month of October. CFJ 1472: Called by root (07 Oct); Judged TRUE by RedKnight (17 Oct) There is a Points Contest named Eris' Contest. CFJ 1471: Called by OscarMeyr (05 Oct); Judged TRUE by Steve (06 Oct) The GWotO is allowed to remove from the Oligarchy an Oligarch whose term of service has expired. CFJ 1470: Called by Murphy (05 Oct); Judged TRUE by Taral (15 Oct) If a player attempts to perform multiple fee-based actions by paying a single amount of kudos, but one of the actions fails, then they all fail. CFJ 1469: Called by Murphy (05 Oct); Judged FALSE by Taral (15 Oct) A player may perform multiple fee-based actions by paying a single amount of kudos equal to the total fees for those actions. CFJ 1468: Called by Murphy (05 Oct); Judged FALSE by Taral (15 Oct) A player may perform multiple fee-based actions (e.g. extending eir Oligarchic Term of Service by the Oligarchic Term twice) by announcing the net effect of those actions. CFJ 1467: Called by Murphy (05 Oct); Judged FALSE by Taral (15 Oct) If a player attempts to spend N kudos to pay a fee, but the fee is smaller than N, then N kudos are still paid. CFJ 1466: Called by Murphy (05 Oct); Judged TRUE by Taral (15 Oct) If a player attempts to spend N kudos to pay a fee, but the fee is smaller than N, then the fee-based action succeeds (assuming it is not otherwise prohibited). CFJ 1465: Called by Murphy (05 Oct); Dismissed by Taral (15 Oct) If a player attempts to spend N kudos to pay a fee, but the fee-based action fails (e.g. the fee is larger than N), then the kudos are still spent. CFJ 1464: Called by RedKnight (30 Sep); Judged TRUE by Taral (15 Oct) RedKnight sucessfuly entered the Oligarchy through at least one of