Case Archive

Criminal record for c.

 

CFJ Called by Statement Judgement
2730 (pt) c. c. violated Rule 2253 (Power-2) by creating the card Presto! in eir possession. NOT GUILTY
2671 (pt) ais523 comex violated R1504, committing the Class-3 Crime of Failure to Apologise, by failing to publish eir apology as soon as possible after the judgement for CFJ 2550 was delivered. GUILTY / SILENCE
2550 (pt) Yally comex violated R1504, committing the Class-3 Crime of Failure To Apologize, by failing to publish eir apology as soon as possible after the judgment for CFJ 2531 was delivered. GUILTY / APOLOGY
2531 (pt) Wooble comex violated the Power 2 Rule 2158 by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ 2499 as soon as possible after e was assigned as its judge. GUILTY / APOLOGY
2451 (pt) Tiger comex broke the power=3 rule 2125 six times by making the announcement "I hereby announce that I performed duties related to Enigma in a timely manner during this month." six times. GUILTY / SILENCE
2435 (pt) ais523 comex broke Power-2 Rule 1742 by failing to act in accordance the PerlNomic Partnership contract by failing to ensure the PNP obeys the rules of Agora to the maximum extent by causing the PNP to publish that the proposal pool was empty when it was not. NOT GUILTY
2388 (pt) G. comex broke Rule 2215 by attempting to mislead persons as to the contents of R2125 in eir publication of the SLR on or about Feb 19, 2009. NOT GUILTY
2368 (pt) Wooble comex violated R911 by failing to publish an appeals opinion to CFJ 2346a as soon as possible after the panel was assigned. GUILTY / DISCHARGE
2353 (pt) Wooble comex violated R2158 (power 2) by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ 2317 as soon as possible after e become assigned to it as Judge. GUILTY / DISCHARGE
2352 (pt) Wooble comex violated R2158 (power 2) by failing to assign a judgement to CFJ 2316 as soon as possible after e become assigned to it as Judge. GUILTY / SILENCE
2293 (pt) c. I violated Rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to register with the same basis as another player. ALREADY TRIED
2273 (pt) woggle comex violated rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to register with the same basis as another player. GUILTY / CHOKEY
2085 (pt) c. comex breached rule 2149 by thinking up statements that will be public although they are not true before e has sent them UNIMPUGNED
2084 (pt) c. comex breached rule 2149 by sending a message with message-id <6bf32280807151511sfca8f7dveb137ee7d95c576 @mail.gmail.com> in which e did not tell the truth (because e did not say anything) SLIPPERY
2044 (pt) ais523 comex violated rule 2185 by failing to assign a judgement to an open and applicable judicial question of CFJ 2006 as soon as possible. UNIMPUGNED
2043 (pt) ais523 comex violated rule 2185 by failing to assign a judgement to an open and applicable judicial question of CFJ 1996 as soon as possible. UNIMPUGNED
2025 (pt) ehird comex violated rule 2149 by lying in the quoted message. SLIPPERY
2022 (pt) Murphy comex violated Rule 1504 by failing to publish an apology for CFJ 1942. GUILTY / CHOKEY
2012 (pt) BobTHJ comex breached Rule 1742 by continued failure to comply with the terms of the binding Equation of CFJ 1915 GUILTY / CHOKEY
2011 (pt) BobTHJ comex breached Rule 1742 by continued failure to comply with the terms of the binding Vote Market contract. GUILTY / CHOKEY
1952 (pt) G. comex violated Rule 101(vii) and Goethe's defined rights by initiating a criminal case against Goethe, when Goethe is already being punished for the same single action (by having to defend emself in a separate, previously-initiated criminal case). UNIMPUGNED
1942 (pt) Wooble comex breached Rule 1742 by not acting in accordance with eir obligations under the Ducks & Platypuses agreement, by being a party to that agreement. GUILTY / APOLOGY
1935 (pt) Wooble comex violated Rule 1742 by failing to act in accordance with eir obligations under the CFJ 1915 equation. OVERLOOKED
1929 (pt) c. comex breached Rule 1742 by claiming that contract R requires that we "*pretend*" that it's a rule, which is not treating it like a rule, but rather a pretend rule, thereby violating its terms INNOCENT
1906 (pt) Zefram comex violated rule 2149 by claiming in message <6bf32280802080851i14c79ea9oa8fc2768a80bc7af @mail.gmail.com> that proposal 5419 passed while not believing that to be true. GUILTY / FINE
1904 (pt) pikhq comex violated Rule 2149/8, Truthfulness, by falsely claiming that there exists a rule 9999. INNOCENT
1853 (pt) G. comex has violated Rule 2149 in his communication of voting on proposal 5380. UNIMPUGNED
1852 (pt) G. comex has violated Rule 2149 in his communication of voting on proposal 5375. UNIMPUGNED
1823 (pt) G. comex violated Rule 2149 by recklessly (and falsely) claiming that I recklessly claimed a false thing. INNOCENT
1783 (pt) Zefram comex breached rule 2149 by knowingly or recklessly claiming, while e was a knight, in message <6bf32280711041554v63a82c17vc2925d02ad455298 @mail.gmail.com>, that Fookiemyartug's personness was part of the CotC's weekly report. GUILTY / APOLOGY
1708 (pt) Zefram comex violated rule 2149 by falsely claiming in message <6bf32280707091136l373a0b37m7e5516a9279d2335 @mail.gmail.com> that eir nickname is "Murphy". UNIMPUGNED